Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1556 Tel
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2023
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.27892 OF 2022
ORDER:
Heard Mr. Mohammed Hassan, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Mr. R. Mangulal, learned Central Government Counsel
appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent
No.3 in refusing to renew/reissue the original passport bearing
No.N644099 issued by respondent No.2 dated 19.02.1993 on the
ground that his parents names cannot be changed in passport due to
their demise, as illegal, and for a consequential direction to respondent
No.3 to renew/reissue the original passport to the petitioner by
changing the names of his parents.
3. The petitioner herein is the holder of Passport bearing
No.N644099, dated 19.02.1993 and the same was extended from time
to time. He has submitted an application Reference No.22-
1005229883, dated 13.05.2022, seeking renewal of his passport. The
same was refused by respondent No.2 on the ground that the names of
the parents of the petitioner are different. After the death of the
parents of the petitioner, correction of their names in the passport is
KL,J W.P. No.27892 of 2022
impermissible. Thus, respondent No.2 kept the original passport of
the petitioner in abeyance and a message was sent accordingly. He
has also issued a publication in Hans India News Paper on 11.06.2022
with regard to the change of the names of the parents of the petitioner.
He has also filed copies of death certificates of his parents issued by
the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) and their
Aadhar Cards. With the said submissions, he sought a direction to
respondent No.2 to consider his application for renewal with change
of names of his parents.
4. On the other hand, Mr. R. Mangulal, learned Central
Government Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, referring
to the written instructions of respondent No.2, would submit that the
petitioner cannot seek change of names of his parents after their death.
Change of name of the petitioner and his spouse can be considered.
Paragraph No.4 of the Chapter - 3 of the Passports Manual, 2020 deals
with 'change in the name of parent (s), while paragraph No.4.2 of the
said Chapter deals with 'change in the name of deceased parents.
There is no law under which a person, not even the legal heirs of a
deceased, can change the name of deceased persons. A deceased
KL,J W.P. No.27892 of 2022
person has throughout his life used the name for all official
transactions during his life period and now his legal heirs/descendents
cannot, for their convenience whatsoever, be allowed to change the
name of a deceased. It is further stated that as per paragraph Nos.4.2
of the Chapter - 3 of the Passports Manual, 2020, based on
documentary proof issued in their life time or name in Death
Certificate, the name of parents as shown in his/her own passport is
significant proof of the correct name and to be accepted on priority.
Besides, parents' name as shown in educational documents/marriage
certificate, birth certificate including revised certificates etc., can also
be accepted as correct, even if issued after the death of parents.
5. The aforesaid facts would reveal that the passport of the
petitioner was expired more than three years ago from the date of
application dated 13.05.2022 and accordingly he has submitted the
application dated 13.05.2022 seeking renewal of his passport. In the
passport, his father's name is mentioned as 'Mohammed Mastan Ali'
instead of 'Mohammed Mastan'. Similarly, his mother's name is
mentioned as 'Fatima Begum' instead of 'Fatima Bee'. Therefore,
respondent No.2 kept the application submitted by the petitioner on
KL,J W.P. No.27892 of 2022
hold on the ground of change in the names of the parents of the
petitioner.
6. Referring to the Circulars, dated 26.11.2015 and 13.01.2016
and also the guidelines issued by the Ministry of External Affairs,
Government of India, vide Office Memorandum, dated 22.09.2016,
this Court in Muchipalli Asutosh Jayanth v. The Government of
India 1 held that the application submitted seeking correction of date
of birth beyond five (05) years is also permissible and the Passport
Authority has to consider the same if the persons seeking correction of
date of birth produce proper explanation and documents.
7. Referring to the latest relaxed guidelines issued by the
Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, the Kerala High
Court in Deepnamol Sebastian v. The Regional Passport Officer,
Ernahipalam P.O. 2, held that mistakes in parents' name can be
corrected even after their death. Thus, correction of date of birth and
name can be considered by the Passport Authority beyond five (05)
years and also after the death of parents of a person.
. Order dated 29.08.2022 in W.P. No.13636 of 2022
. 2021 (5) KLT 197
KL,J W.P. No.27892 of 2022
8. In the present case, the petitioner herein had submitted the
death certificates of his parents issued by the GHMC and also filed
copies of their Aadhar Cards. He has also filed notice published in
Hans India Newspaper on 11.06.2022. Respondent No.2 instead of
considering the application submitted by the petitioner on 13.05.2022
for renewal of his passport with correction of names of his parents,
kept the passport on hold. Respondent No.2 cannot keep a passport on
hold without deciding the same as per the guidelines and the Circulars
issued by respondent No.1 from time to time.
9. At the cost of repetition, as discussed above, correction of
date of birth and names etc., is permissible beyond five (05) years if
the holder of passport produced sufficient documentary evidence and
also offers proper explanation. Even correction of names of the
parents is also permissible after their death.
10. In view of the above discussion, this writ petition is
disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider the application
reference No.22-1005229883, dated 13.05.2022, submitted by the
petitioner seeking renewal of his passport with correction of names of
his parents in accordance with the aforesaid Circulars and principle
KL,J W.P. No.27892 of 2022
laid down in the aforesaid judgments. If respondent No.2 is not
inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall assign
specific reasons, pass a reasoned order and communicate copy of the
said order to the petitioner herein. He shall complete the aforesaid
exercise within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of
copy of this order. However, there shall be no order as costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
the writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________ K. LAKSHMAN, J 10th April, 2023 Mgr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!