Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4622 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
I.T.T.A. No.251 of 2003
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)
Heard Mr. B.Narsimha Sarma, learned counsel
representing Ms. K.Mamata Chowdary, learned Senior
Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department appearing for
the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel
for the respondent.
2. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax
Act, 1961, has been filed against the order dated 11.03.2003
passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad
Bench 'A', Hyderabad (Tribunal) in I.T.A.No.1286/Hyd/1995
for the assessment year 1991-92.
3. In the appeal, the following substantial questions of law
have been proposed:
"A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that Accounting Standard-7 prescribed by Institute of Chartered Accountants would be appropriate and applicable even in relation to execution of turnkey projects of engineering contracts of a shorter duration ?
B) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is justified in recording the finding that the method of accounting system maintained by the assessee is not correct, notwithstanding the assessee adopting inapplicable AS-7 to an engineering contract of a shorter duration ?
C) Whether the findings of the Appellate Tribunal in this behalf are based on material on record ? D) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that rejection of books of accounts is impermissible merely because the assessee had maintained accounts in accordance with AS-7 consistently?
4. On 15.12.2003, the appeal was admitted.
5. In the hearing today, we have perused the assessment
order dated 23.03.1994. We find therefrom that the taxable
income of the respondent was determined at Rs.4,17,419.00
and quantum of tax to be paid was assessed at
Rs.2,72,249.00.
6. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued
Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019, amending the
previous Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, by further
enhancing the monetary limits for filing appeals by the
Income Tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme Court as a measure for
reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the said circular we
find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appeal before
the High Court is Rs.1.00 crore.
7. In the instant appeal, tax effect is of
Rs.2,72,249/-, which is well below the monetary limit.
8. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is
dismissed in terms of the aforesaid Circular No.17 of 2019,
dated 08.08.2019. However, if the appeal comes within the
exception under paragraph 10 of Circular No.3 of 2018, it
would be open to the Income Tax Department to seek revival
of the appeal.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
______________________________________ UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ
______________________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J 14.09.2022 Lur
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!