Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Commissioner Of Income Taxiii vs M/S.Incon Engineering P Ltd
2022 Latest Caselaw 4622 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4622 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022

Telangana High Court
The Commissioner Of Income Taxiii vs M/S.Incon Engineering P Ltd on 14 September, 2022
Bench: Ujjal Bhuyan, C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
       THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
                                          AND
           THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
                        I.T.T.A. No.251 of 2003
JUDGMENT:      (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)



     Heard       Mr.       B.Narsimha              Sarma,          learned      counsel

representing      Ms.       K.Mamata             Chowdary,          learned      Senior

Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department appearing for

the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranjan, learned counsel

for the respondent.

2. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax

Act, 1961, has been filed against the order dated 11.03.2003

passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad

Bench 'A', Hyderabad (Tribunal) in I.T.A.No.1286/Hyd/1995

for the assessment year 1991-92.

3. In the appeal, the following substantial questions of law

have been proposed:

"A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that Accounting Standard-7 prescribed by Institute of Chartered Accountants would be appropriate and applicable even in relation to execution of turnkey projects of engineering contracts of a shorter duration ?

B) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is justified in recording the finding that the method of accounting system maintained by the assessee is not correct, notwithstanding the assessee adopting inapplicable AS-7 to an engineering contract of a shorter duration ?

C) Whether the findings of the Appellate Tribunal in this behalf are based on material on record ? D) Whether the Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that rejection of books of accounts is impermissible merely because the assessee had maintained accounts in accordance with AS-7 consistently?

4. On 15.12.2003, the appeal was admitted.

5. In the hearing today, we have perused the assessment

order dated 23.03.1994. We find therefrom that the taxable

income of the respondent was determined at Rs.4,17,419.00

and quantum of tax to be paid was assessed at

Rs.2,72,249.00.

6. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued

Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019, amending the

previous Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, by further

enhancing the monetary limits for filing appeals by the

Income Tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate

Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme Court as a measure for

reducing litigation. In paragraph 2 of the said circular we

find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appeal before

the High Court is Rs.1.00 crore.

7. In the instant appeal, tax effect is of

Rs.2,72,249/-, which is well below the monetary limit.

8. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Department is

dismissed in terms of the aforesaid Circular No.17 of 2019,

dated 08.08.2019. However, if the appeal comes within the

exception under paragraph 10 of Circular No.3 of 2018, it

would be open to the Income Tax Department to seek revival

of the appeal.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

______________________________________ UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ

______________________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J 14.09.2022 Lur

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter