Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Talluri Padmavathi vs The Station House Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 4618 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4618 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022

Telangana High Court
Talluri Padmavathi vs The Station House Officer on 14 September, 2022
Bench: T.Vinod Kumar
             THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

                     Writ Petition No.35497 of 2022
ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare

the action of the respondents No.1 & 2 in not preventing respondents 3

to 5 from interfering with the petitioners' peaceful possession and

enjoyment of plot No.39 in Sy.No.78 of Madhapur Village,

Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy District for effective

implementation of the interim order dt.27.11.2012 in IA.No.1470 of

2012 in OS.No.1526 of 2012 on the file of the VIII Additional Senior

Civil Judge, Rangareddy District (presently renumbered as

OS.No.780/2021 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge,

Kukatpally, Rangareddy District) as being illegal, arbitrary and in

violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

2. Heard counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for

Home appearing for respondents 1 & 2 and with their consent, the Writ

Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the stage of admission.

3. Petitioners contend that the father of the 1st and 2nd petitioners

had purchased the subject property under a registered document

bearing No.1738/2012, dt.13.02.2012 from one S.Gangadhar Reddy,

and are in possession of the same; that when the unofficial respondent

No.3 sought to interfere with the possession of the petitioners' father on

the said plot, he had filed suit being OS.No.1526 of 2012 seeking

Perpetual Injunction and also obtained a temporary injunction under

Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of CPC vide order, dt.27.11.2012, in

IA.No.1470 of 2012; that the said injunction order was passed by the

Court below after hearing the parties and is subsisting as on date.

4. Petitioners further contend that during the subsistence of the

injunction order, when the unofficial respondents tried to interfere with

the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners of the subject

property, they approached the respondents-authorities for enforcement

of the injunction order, but they are not taking steps for implementation

of the said injunction order granted in their favour.

5. Learned Government Pleader, on the other hand, on instructions

submits that petitioners did not approach the respondents as being

claimed by them and that no complaint, which is stated to have been

made by them on 21.08.2022 is received by the respondents-

authorities, and that since the dispute between the petitioners and

unofficial respondents is civil in nature and the petitioners having

obtained an injunction order by approaching the competent Civil Court,

proper course for the petitioners would be to approach the concerned

Civil Court to obtain an order of police protection. He also placed

reliance on the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Butti

Devendramma vs State Of Telangana1 and sought to direct the

petitioners to approach the concerned Civil Court under Order XXXIX

Order dt. 07.06.2022 in WA.No.355 of 2022

Rule 2A CPC, which had granted injunction as the said Court would

have complete view of the subject matter.

5. Learned Government Pleader would further submit that if the

petitioners approach the concerned Civil Court and obtains an order of

police protection, respondent-authorities would comply with the said

orders and in the absence of any such direction, the respondents

authorities cannot interfere in civil disputes between the petitioners and

the unofficial respondents.

6. Having regard to the submissions as made above, liberty is

granted to the petitioners to approach the competent Civil Court where

OS.No.780/2021 filed by the father of the 1st and 2nd petitioners (OS.No.

1526 of 2012 (old)) is pending, by filing an application seeking police

aid/protection.

7. Subject to the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

No order as to costs.

8. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall

stand closed.

_____________________ T. VINOD KUMAR, J 14th September, 2022

gra

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

Writ Petition No. 35497 of 2022

Dt.14.09.2022

gra

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter