Saturday, 18, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Duvvuri Nageshwar Reddy vs Smt. Nunemunthala Saraswati Smt. ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 6272 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6272 Tel
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2022

Telangana High Court
Dr. Duvvuri Nageshwar Reddy vs Smt. Nunemunthala Saraswati Smt. ... on 30 November, 2022
Bench: Shameem Akther, Nagesh Bheemapaka
       THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
                         AND
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

      CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.509 of 2022

JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Dr.SA,J)

      This appeal, under Order XLIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908 (for short "C.P.C"), is filed by the appellant/

defendant No.4, aggrieved by the order, dated 18.12.2021,

passed in I.A.No.1395 of 2021 in O.S.No.303 of 2021 by the

learned VI Additional District Judge, at Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy

District, in granting ex parte ad interim injunction order in favour

of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein/plaintiffs in respect of the

petition schedule property and extending the same until further

orders vide docket order dated 23.06.2022.

2. Heard the submissions of Sri B.Chandrasen Reddy, learned

Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant/defendant No.4, Sri

M.V.Durga Prasad, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent

Nos.1 to 3/plaintiffs and perused the record. Notices sent to

respondent Nos.4 to 6 were not yet returned.

3. In the course of submissions, it is brought to the notice of

this Court that the name of the appellant/defendant No.4 was

wrongly mentioned in the subject I.A.No.1395 of 2021, the suit in 2 Dr.SA,J & NBK,J CMA No.509 of 2022

O.S.No.303 of 2021 and the impugned orders dated 18.12.2021

and 23.06.2022, and it needs to be corrected by the respondent

Nos.1 to 3/plaintiffs. The learned counsel for the respondent

Nos.1 to 3/plaintiffs would submit that he will take necessary

measures to correct the name of the appellant/defendant No.4 in

the subject suit and the Interlocutory Applications pending before

Court below.

4. It is contended by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for

the appellant/defendant No.4 that without proper mentioning of

the name of the appellant/defendant No.4 and by

misrepresenting the facts, the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein/

plaintiffs obtained ex parte ad interim injunction order in their

favour.

5. It is evident from the material placed on record that the

respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein/plaintiffs filed the subject

I.A.No.1395 of 2021 in O.S.No.303 of 2021 before the Court

below, seeking ad interim injunction against the appellant/

defendant No.4 and respondent Nos.4 to 6/defendant Nos.1 to 3

on 15.12.2021. The Court below vide impugned order dated

18.12.2021 granted ex parte ad interim injunction order in favour

of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein/plaintiffs in respect of the 3 Dr.SA,J & NBK,J CMA No.509 of 2022

petition schedule property and extended the same until further

orders vide docket order dated 23.06.2022. The contention of the

appellant/defendant No.4 is that by wrongly mentioning his name

and misrepresenting the facts, the respondent Nos.1 to 3 herein/

plaintiffs obtained ex parte ad interim injunction order in their

favour. At this juncture, it is not appropriate to express any

opinion in relation to merits of the case. The said exercise is

required to be carried out by the Court below. As per the

mandate given under Order XXXIX Rule 3A of CPC, the Court

below is required to dispose of the subject I.A.No.1395 of 2021

within thirty (30) days from the date on which the injunction was

granted. Much time has been passed. By this time, the Court

below ought to have finally disposed of the subject I.A. In view of

these circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the

Court below to dispose of the subject I.A. pending on its file,

expeditiously.

6. Accordingly, the Court below is directed to dispose of the

subject I.A.No.1395 of 2021 in O.S.No.303 of 2021 pending on its

file, within a period of three (03) weeks from today. It is needless

to say that the direction given herein shall also apply to the Court

having additional charge.

                                   4                         Dr.SA,J & NBK,J
                                                         CMA No.509 of 2022




7. With the above direction, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is

disposed of.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in this appeal, shall

stand closed. No costs.

_______________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J

_______________________ NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J Date: 30.11.2022 Note: Issue C.C. by 01.12.2022.

(b/o) scs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter