Saturday, 18, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

E.Balaiah vs Ramachandrapuram Municipality
2022 Latest Caselaw 6238 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6238 Tel
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2022

Telangana High Court
E.Balaiah vs Ramachandrapuram Municipality on 29 November, 2022
Bench: P.Madhavi Devi
 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI

                W.P.No. 10120 OF 2021


ORDER:

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner

seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the

respondents in not granting/releasing the periodical

increments to the petitioner herein while granting such

benefits to other time scale employees on the basis of

various Court orders, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust,

discriminatory and violative of principles of natural

justice.

2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present writ

petition are that the petitioner was appointed as a

Sweeper (NMR) on 01.06.1984 against the sanctioned

post by the District Collector, Medak, vide Proceedings

No.1397/83/A2-PTS, dated 1998, in the respondent

No.1 organization and his pay was enhanced from time

PMD,J W.P.No.10120 of 2021

to time and also extended the benefit of revised pay

scales. It is submitted that subsequently, the question of

releasing of periodical increments to the individuals

whose pay was fixed in minimum time scale, subject to

pending regularization of respective NMR employees

services fell for consideration before the Andhra Pradesh

Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.7195 of 2002 and the

Tribunal has held that the NMR employees whose pay is

fixed in the minimum time scale of pay are also eligible

for periodical increments.

3. It is submitted that subsequently certain NMR time

scale employees of Panchayat Raj Department

approached the Tribunal in O.A.No.90379 of 2011

seeking a direction for release of periodical increments

and the Tribunal has disposed of the said O.A. vide

orders dated 24.11.2011 in terms of earlier judicial

pronouncements.

PMD,J W.P.No.10120 of 2021

4. It is submitted that aggrieved by the order of the

Tribunal, the Department has filed W.P.No.16996 of

2012 and the same was dismissed vide orders dated

12.06.2012. It is submitted that the in W.P.No.26788 of

2017, dated 10.08.2017, was also disposed of holding

that the petitioners therein are entitled for periodical

increments. It is submitted that Government of

Telangana vide G.O.Rt.No.132 PR&RD (PR.II)

Department, dated 28.02.2017 and G.O.Rt.No.498

PR&RD (PR.II) Department, dated 18.07.2018, had

issued orders granting annual grade increments and

other benefits to the NMR time scale employees by duly

implementing the orders of the Tribunal and High Court.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the

judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

H.L.Trehan Vs. Union of India1, for the proportion that

once the case of one employee is decided by the

1 1989 (2) USJ SC 145

PMD,J W.P.No.10120 of 2021

competent Court, the other identically placed employees

should also have been given the same benefit without

any further litigation. Since the petitioner is also

claiming the similar relief as given to other similarly

placed persons, the present writ petition has been filed.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before

this Court the copies of the G.O.Rt.No.468, dated

23.07.2015, G.O.Rt.No.132, dated 28.02.2017,

G.O.Rt.No.498, dated 18.07.2018 and Proceedings

No.A1/1024/2003-2018, dated 04.04.2019, wherein the

Government has implemented the directions of the

Tribunal as well as High Court and granted Annual

Grade Increments and Earned Leaves along with arrears

from the date of allowing minimum time scale to the time

scale employees, like the writ petitioner.

7. Heard the learned Standing counsel for the

respondents.

PMD,J W.P.No.10120 of 2021

8. Having regard to the fact that in similar

circumstances, this Court had already directed the

respondents therein to extend the benefit of

G.O.Rt.No.468, dated 23.07.2015 and the subsequent

G.Os., to the employees drawing minimum time scale

pay such as the petitioner herein, this Court deems it fit

and proper to direct the respondents herein to extend the

said benefits to the petitioner herein also.

9. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed. There

shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ

Petition, shall stand closed.

____________________________ JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI

Dated: 29.11.2022 bak

PMD,J W.P.No.10120 of 2021

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI

W.P.No. 10120 OF 2021

Dated:29.11.2022

bak

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter