Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5836 Tel
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
W.P. No. 11641 of 2019
Between:
K.Satyanarayana Reddy ... Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by Its Principal Secretary
Agriculture and Cooperation
Seri Department Secretariat
Hyderabad and others
... Respondents
JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 15.11.2022
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers : yes
may be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be
marked to Law Reporters/Journals? : yes
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to
see the fair copy of the Judgment? : yes
____________________
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
WP_11641_2019
2 SN,J
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
W.P. No. 11641 of 2019
% 15.11.2022
Between:
# K.Satyanarayana Reddy
..... Petitioner
and
$ The State of Telangana and others
.....Respondents
< Gist:
> Head Note:
! Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr A. Thirupathi Goud
^Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Agriculture
? Cases Referred:
WP_11641_2019
3 SN,J
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
W.P. No. 11641 of 2019
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Government Pleader for Agriculture.
2. This writ petition is filed to issue Writ of Certiorari
calling for records relating to the impugned
Proc.Rc.No.800/2012-B3A, dated 23.04.2019 issued by the
2nd respondent and quash or set aside the same and
consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled for sanction of
Automatic Advancement Scales on completion of 12/18 years
of service in the category of Farm Foreman Grade0II
(Technical Officer) by duly counting his service from the date
of his promotion to the said post i.e. on 16.12.1991 or at
least from the date of completion of 45 years of age and
exempted from passing the departmental test on 30.09.1998
in terms of G.O.Ms.No.225, GAD, dated 18.05.1999 with all
consequential benefits including revision of pension and other
retirement benefits.
3) The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
WP_11641_2019 4 SN,J
a) The petitioner was originally appointed as Operative
with effect from 21.06.1989 and his services were regularized
and probation was also declared. While so, the 3rd
respondent issued proceedings Rc.No.E/1780/99, dated
01.09.1999 withdrawing the increments sanctioned to him
during the years 1993, 1994, 1995 and 1996 on the
untenable ground that he had not passed departmental tests
within the prescribed time as per conditions stipulated in the
promotion orders.
b) The petitioner challenged the said orders in
O.A.No.6007 of 1999 before the Tribunal and the Tribunal
issued interim direction on 08.10.1999 suspending the
impugned orders dated 04.08.1999 and 01;.09.1999 and
directed the respondents to draw the same which the
applicants were drawing prior to the issuance of the impugned
orders.
c) The petitioner was reverted to the post of Farm
Foreman Grade II (Operative) on 02.09.2000 on untenable
grounds that he has not passed departmental tests prescribed
for the post of Technical Officer within the prescribed time
limit.
WP_11641_2019
5 SN,J
d) On the date of petitioner's reversion, he crossed 45
years of age. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed
O.A.No.8428 of 2000 before the Tribunal. The Tribunal
granted interim direction in the said OA on 22.12.2000,
directing the respondents to continue the petitioner as
Technical Officer since he had completed 45 years of age and
further Farm Foreman Grade II is the first stage of promotion
in the service as per G.O.Ms.No.225,GAD, dated 18.05.1999.
e) Based on the said directions, the Government issued
memo dated 15.02.2001 directing the 2nd respondent to take
further action in the matter and accordingly, the respondents
issued proceedings dated 10.04.2003 promoting the petitioner
to the post of Farm Foreman Grade-II on regular basis
consequent on passing of departmental tests. Based on the
said memo dated 15.02.2001 produced before the Tribunal,
the Tribunal closed O.A on 06.03.2004 as no further orders
are necessary.
f) As the petitioner continued in the post of Technical
Officer, he would have been entitled for 12 years increment in
terms of the Government policy, but the respondents are
counting the services of the petitioner in the post of Technical WP_11641_2019 6 SN,J
Officer w.e.f. 2003 onwards i.e. the date of passing
departmental tests which is totally illegal. Therefore, this writ
petition is filed.
4. The counter filed by the respondents, in brief, is
as follows:
a) As per G.O.Ms.No.120 Indu & Coop (SP&S) Department,
dated 09.03.1989, a member of service who has not passed
the Sericulture test, but he is otherwise qualified and suitable
for promotion to such category, grade or post may be
promoted thereto temporarily. If a member so promoted
does not pass the said test in one of the first two
examinations held after such promotion he shall be reverted
to the category, grade or post which he was promoted and
shall not again be eligible for promotion under this rule.
b) As per Rule 5 read with Annexure in G.O.Ms.No.4
Housing (Sericulture) Department, dated 13.11.1990, one
must have passed the Sericulture Departmental Test Part I for
promotion to the category of Form Foremen Grade II now
Technical Officer from the post of Operative now Technical
Assistant.
WP_11641_2019
7 SN,J
c) Since the petitioner has not completed 12 years of
service in the cadre of Technical Officer from the date he was
promoted and reported as Technical Officer on 16.04.2003
and hence, the said request was rejected. The petitioner was
retired on 30.09.2013 i.e. after 10 years incremental service
only. Hence, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
PERUSED THE RECORD :
5. Paras 2, 3, 4, 11, 13, 15 & 17of the counter
affidavit filed on behalf of the Respondents read as
under :
Para 2 : As per G.O.Ms.No.120 Indu & Coop. (SP&S) Dept., dated 09.03.1989, a member of service who has not passed the Sericulture Test but he is otherwise qualified and suitable for promotion to such category, grade or post may be promoted thereto temporarily. If a member so promote does not pass first two examinations held after such promotion he shall be reverted to category, grade or post which he was promoted and shall not again be eligible for promotion under this rule.
Para 3 : As per rule-5 read with Annexure in GO Ms. No. 4 Housing (Sericulture) Dept. dated: 13.11.1998, One must have passed the Sericulture Departmental Test Part-I for promotion to the category of Farm Forman Grade-II now Technical Officer from the post of Operative now Technical Asst.
Para 4 : It is respectfully submitted that in the instant case of Sri K.Satyanarayana Reddy. Technical Officer (Retired) as on the date he was promoted as Farm Foremen now Technical Officer on 16.12.1991 vide Pro. Rc: No. 319/91-E. Dated: 06.12.1991, the pre-condition of passing of WP_11641_2019 8 SN,J
Department Test Part-I for promotion to the post of Farm Foremen now Technical Officer was prevailing in G.O. Ms.No.4 Housing (Sericulture) Dept. dated: 13.11.1990. However, he was temporarily promoted as Farm Foremen now Technical Officer with a pre-condition to pass the Sericulture Departmental Test Part-I in one of the first (2) examinations held after Promotion failing which he shall be reverted to the lower category in terms of per GO. Ms. No. 120 Indy & Co (Sp & S) Dept. Dated: 09-03-1989.
Para 11 : It is submitted that as per orders issued in GO Ms.No.225 GAD (Ser.C) Dept., dt. 18.05.1999, exemption is applicable in case of Departmental Tests or Special Tests only, were they are prescribed as a pre-requisite for promotion and this exemption shall not be applicable were like Technical or academic qualifications are prescribed for promotion in the next higher category of posts.
Para 13 : Further it is to submit that, in pursuance of the APAT orders dated: 29. 10.-2014 in OA No.6265/2014, representation dated: 30.08.2013 was examined and speaking orders issued Vide Memo Rc.No.800/2012-B3A, dated: 02.12.2014 through the Asst. Director of Sericulture, Elkathurthy duly informing that, passing of departmental test part-1 is a pre-requisite technical qualification for promotion to the cadre of Technical Officer. Hence as per GO Ms.No.225 GAD (Ser.C) Dept. Dated: 18.05.1999, he is not eligible for exemption from passing of Sericulture Departmental Test Part-I on completion of (45) years of age and sanction of (12) years Special promotion post scale -I A. Further, he has not completed (12) years of service in the cadre of Technical Officer from the date he was promoted and reported as Technical Officer on 16/04/2003. Hence his request to sanction of (12) years automatic advancement scale is rejected. The representation made by him was disposed off accordingly.
Para 15 : It is respectfully submitted that, the petitioner very well knows that, he was personally called by, the then Commissioner of Sericulture (FAC) and explained the above position and informed that, he is not eligible for (12) years SPPS-I as he has not completed (12) years incremental service in the cadre of Technical Officer w.e.f. 16.04.2003 and was retired from Govt. service on 30.09.2013 ie after completion of (10) years incremental service only. Even in the office Memo dated: 31.01.2017 after informing the above WP_11641_2019 9 SN,J
position to the petitioner, petitioner is habitually submitting representations to the Commissioner of Sericulture and Govt. of Telangana.
Para 17 : It is respectfully submitted that, passing of departmental test part- I is a pre-requisite technical qualification for promotion to the cadre of Technical Officer. Hence as per GO Ms.No.225 GAD (Ser.C) Dept. Dated: 18- 05-1999, he is not eligible for exemption from passing of Sericulture Departmental Test Part-I on completion of (45) years of age and sanction of (12) years Special promotion post scale-I A. Further, he has not completed (12) years of service in the cadre of Technical Officer from the date he was promoted and reported as Technical Officer on 16.04.2003. Hence his request for sanction of (12) years automatic advancement scale is rejected.
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION :
6. Taking into consideration the specific averments
made in the counter affidavit filed by the Respondents
paras 2, 3, 4, 11, 13, 15 & 17 (referred to and extracted
above), this Court is of the firm opinion that the
petitioner is not entitled for the prayer as sought for.
7. As per Rule 5 read with Annexure in G.O.Ms.No.4,
Housing (Sericulture) Department, dt. 13.11.1990, one
must have passed the Sericulture Departmental Test
Part-I for promotion to the category of Farm Foreman
Grade-II. A bare perusal of Clause 5 of G.O.Ms.No.4, dt.
13.11.1990 which deals with qualifications reads as
under :
WP_11641_2019 10 SN,J
Clause 5 Qualifications : No person shall be eligible for appointment to the category specified in column(1) of the Annexure by the method specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) unless he possesses the qualifications specified in the corresponding entry in column (3) thereof.
Clause 10 Tests :
10 (b) Every person appointed by direct recruitment to the category of Farm Foreman, Grade II shall pass Sericulture Departmental Test within the period of probation.
8. This Court opines that in view of the fact that
passing of the Departmental Test Part-I is a pre-
requisite technical qualification for promotion to the
cadre of Technical Officer. Hence, as per G.O.Ms.No.225
GAD (Ser.C) Department, dt. 18.05.1999 the petitioner
is not eligible for exemption from passing of Sericulture
Departmental Test Part-I on completion of 45 years of
age and sanction of (12) years Special Promotion Post
Scale - IA. Hence there is no any illegality in rejecting
the request of the Petitioner for sanction of (12) years
automatic advancement scale.
9. Taking into consideration the above referred facts
and circumstances the petitioner in the present Writ
Petition is not entitled for the relief as prayed for by the WP_11641_2019 11 SN,J
Petitioner since the Petitioner does not satisfy the
qualification criteria specified in the corresponding
entry in Column 3 thereof, as per Clause 5 of
G.O.Ms.No.4, dt. 13.11.1990 which deals with
qualifications as referred to in the counter affidavit
filed by the respondents.
10. For all the reasons stated above, the Writ Petition
is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
dismissed.
_________________ SUREPALLI NANDA, J Date: 15.11.2022 Note : L.R. copy to be marked b/o kvrm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!