Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5758 Tel
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
O.S.A.No.10 of 2012
JUDGMENT:(per Hon'ble Sri Justice T.Vinod Kumar)
Despite the matter being listed under the caption 'For Dismissal',
none appears on behalf of the appellant.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent would
submit that the appellant had filed a Memo dt.21.03.2013 into this
Court stating therein that in compliance with the order of this Court,
dt.15.02.2012 passed in C.A.No.390 of 2009, the amounts payable as
differential interest were calculated and deposited with the State Bank
of Hyderabad, High Court Branch, and that the bank had paid out the
same in favour of the respondent and thus, the OSA has become
infructuous.
3. Placing on record the above said submission made on behalf of
the respondent, since there is no representation on behalf of the
appellant, the OSA is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this OSA shall stand
closed. No order as to costs.
__________________ T. VINOD KUMAR, J
Date:10.11.2022 _________________ PULLA KARTHIK, J GJ
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
O.S.A.No.10 of 2012 (per Hon'ble Sri Justice T.Vinod Kumar)
10.11.2022
GJ
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!