Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5719 Tel
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2022
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.33 of 2010
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Dr.SA,J)
Heard. Perused the record.
2. The appellant-Smt.Singam Supriya @ Lavanya, is present in
person before this Court today. She is identified by Sri E.Rajesh,
Advocate (Code: 22870). The appellant produced her Aadhaar
card, which establishes her identity. After examination of the I.D
proof, it is returned to the appellant. The appellant has orally
informed this Court that she does not want to proceed with this
appeal and intends to withdraw the same. She also made an
endorsement on the E.B. to that effect.
3. In view of these circumstances, this Family Court Appeal is
dismissed as not-pressed.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal, shall
stand closed. No order as to costs.
___________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J
___________________ NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA,J Date: 08th November, 2022 SCS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!