Saturday, 18, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T. Anil Singh vs The State Of Telangana And 5 Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 6518 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6518 Tel
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2022

Telangana High Court
T. Anil Singh vs The State Of Telangana And 5 Others on 6 December, 2022
Bench: Ujjal Bhuyan, C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
  THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

                                AND

   THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY


                WRIT APPEAL No.795 of 2022


JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan)


      Heard Mr. Madhusudan Reddy Gavinolla, learned

counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vinay Reddy, learned

counsel representing Mr. B.Bal Reddy, learned counsel for

respondent     Nos.5     &   6/writ    petitioners.    Also   heard

Mr. T.Srikanth Reddy, learned Government Pleader for

Revenue for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. This writ appeal is directed against the order

dated 29.10.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge

disposing of Writ Petition No.39843 of 2022 filed by

respondent Nos.5 & 6 as the writ petitioners.

3. Respondent Nos.5 & 6 had filed the related writ

petition seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 for

taking steps for mutation of their names in Dharani portal 2 HCJ & CVBRJ W.A.No.795 of 2022

and also for issuance of new Dharani passbooks in respect

of land to the extent of Ac. 2.24 guntas out of Ac. 10.14

guntas in Survey No.28, situated at Peerzadiguda Village,

Medipally Mandal in Medchal-Malkajgiri District ('subject

land' hereinafter) pursuant to their applications vide

application Nos.LM2100052903 and LM2100057621.

4. Before the learned Single Judge, learned

Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that

District Collector, Medchal-Malkajgiri District would

consider the online applications of respondent Nos.5 & 6.

It was thereafter that learned Single Judge disposed of the

writ petition in the following manner:

"6. In view of the said discussion, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to consider the online application Nos.LM2100052903 and LM2100057621, submitted by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law by putting the petitioners and all effected parties on notice and affording them an opportunity of hearing. If, the 3rd respondent is not 3 HCJ & CVBRJ W.A.No.795 of 2022

inclined to accept the claim made by the petitioners, he shall assign specific reasons and pass a reasoned order, communicate copy of the said order to the petitioners and complete the said exercise within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs."

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that

appellant and respondent Nos.5 & 6 belong to the same

family. There is a family dispute as regards the subject

land, in respect of which civil litigation is pending at the

appellate stage. Suppressing this fact, the related writ

petition was filed.

6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties

and on due consideration, we are of the view that learned

Single Judge had taken care to ensure that no prejudice is

caused to any person. Learned Single Judge only directed

the District Collector to consider the two online

applications of respondent Nos.5 & 6 in accordance with

law by putting respondent Nos.5 & 6 and all affected 4 HCJ & CVBRJ W.A.No.795 of 2022

parties on notice and after affording them opportunity of

hearing. 3rd respondent was directed to pass a reasoned

order thereafter and to communicate the same to

respondent Nos.5 & 6.

7. We make it clear that appellant Sri T.Anil Singh

shall also be heard by the District Collector, Medchal-

Malkajgiri District, while considering the two online

applications of respondent Nos.5 & 6. It will be open to the

appellant to raise all possible grounds in objection to the

said applications, which shall be heard and decided by the

3rd respondent in accordance with law and after giving due

opportunity of hearing to all the stake holders. Whatever

decision is taken by the 3rd respondent, the same shall be

communicated to all the parties. We make it clear that we

have not expressed any opinion on merit and all

contentions are kept open.

8. This disposes of the Writ Appeal. However,

there shall be no order as to costs.

                                5                   HCJ & CVBRJ
                                              W.A.No.795 of 2022




    9.     As    a   sequel,       miscellaneous   applications

pending, if any, in this Writ Appeal, shall stand closed.

___________________________ UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ

___________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J

Date: 06.12.2022 KL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter