Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3990 Tel
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2022
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION No. 21302 OF 2019
O R D E R:
Initially, the Writ Petition was filed seeking the
following relief:
" to issue a writ or an order or a direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 4 to 12 in conducting investigation into multiple FIRs. in relation to same set of facts as illegal, arbitrary and violaive of Articles 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct that Cr.No. 440/2019 on the file of P.S. Gachibowli, Cr.No. 180/2019 on the file of P.S. Madhapur, Crime No. 93 of 2017 on the file of P.S. Adilabad Town-1, Crime No. 578 of 2019 on the file of P.S. Meerpet, Crime No. 1122 of 2019 on the file of P.S. Rajendernagar, Crime No. 572 of 2019 on the file of P.S. KPHB Colony and other crimes if any pending be transferred to a single investigating agency to deal with the same as a single case and treat either one of them registered as an FIR under Section 154 Cr.P.C. and other FIRs. can be treated as a statement under S.162 Cr.P.C.".
2. I.A.No. 1 of 2022 is filed for amendment of prayer as
under:
" The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or an order or a direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents 4 to 10 in conducting investigation into multiple FIRs. in relation to same set of facts as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct that Crime No. 338 of 2008 on the file of P.S. Hanamkonda,
Warangal, Crime No. 93 of 2017 on the file of P.S. I Town, Adilabad, Cr.No. 180/2019 on the file of P.S. Madhapur (Guttala), Cyberabad, Cr.No. 440 of 2019 on the file of P.S. Gachibowli, Cyberabad, Crime No. 572 of 2019 on the file of P.S. KPHB Colony, Cyberabad, Crime No. 1122 of 2019 on the file of P.S. Rajendernagar, Crime No. 578 of 2019 on the file of P.S. Meerpet, Rachakonda, Crime No. 619 of 2019 on the file of P.S. Shadnagar, Cyberabad, Crime No. 583 of 2019 on the file of P.S. R.C. Puram, Cyberabad and other crimes if any pending be transferred to first FIR registered in the State of Telangana i.e. Crime NO. 338 of 2008 on the file of P.S. Hanamkonda, Warangal which is numbered as C.C.No. 2 of 2016 pending before Hon'ble I Principal Senior Civil Judge Court at Warangal to deal as a single case and other FIRs. be treated as a statement under S. 161 Cr.P.C. and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice.'
3. Sri P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy, learned counsel
representing Sri R. Balaraj Goud, learned counsel for the
petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 is the Managing
Director of e-BIZ.com. Pvt. Ltd., which is into Direct Selling
Entity and is registered /incorporated with the Registrar of
Companies as per the Companies Act, 1956. He submits that in
the Memorandum of Association of the company, it is stated
that the company is created to do business in whole of India or
abroad and the company is working directly in accordance with
the Model Framework for guidelines on direct selling as
published in the Gazette of India by the Central Government
and even the Government of India has listed the company as
Direct Selling Entity at Sl.No. 135. It is submitted that the
company does not collect any amount for joining in the
company and any person can join the company without any cost
as retailer and do business by selling its product / services to
consumers. It is submitted that in addition to that, the
company provides 18 computer courses absolutely free of cost
to its retailers and also the company is not running any pyramid
scheme. It is further submitted that on 04.02.2019, the
petitioners came to know that FIR No. 93 of 2017 dated
21.04.2017 is registered on the file of Adilabad Police Station for
the offences under Section 420 read with Section 34 IPC. and
Section 4 of Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme
(Banning) Act, 1978. It is submitted that the police from
Adilabad-I Town Police Station along with police from Noida
reached the office premises of the company and made inquiry
from the office staff and petitioner No.1 is not available in the
office. Learned counsel submits that later, the petitioners found
that the said team is here in connection with FIR No. 93 of 2017
dated 21.04.2017 and they filed Crl.P.No. 798 of 2019 before
this Court to quash the proceedings in FIR No. 93 of 2017 and
the same is pending. It is submitted that thereafter, multiple
FIRs. were registered and along with Crime No. 93 of 2017, six
FIRs., were registered at Adilabad Town, Madhapur, Gachibowli,
KPHB Colony, Rajendernagar and Meerpet Police Stations. It is
also submitted that further, on 08.03.2019, the officers of the
4th respondent had taken away the 2nd petitioner forcibly and
illegally along with his phone, laptop and the car by snatching
the same from him and manhandled him. Learned counsel
submits that the 1st petitioner filed Habeas Corpus Petition on
12.03.2019 for petitioner No.2 and on the same day, the 4th
respondent held a press conference by falsely declaring that the
2nd petitioner has been arrested in connection with Crime No.
180 of 2019. He submits that on 12.03.2019, officers of the 4th
respondent released the 2nd petitioner from illegal custody after
five days stating that he should withdraw Habeas Corpus
petition. He further submits that the petitioners filed Writ
Petition No. 5132 of 2019 questioning the action of the
respondents in registering criminal cases against the company
and its directors as illegal and in violation of the guidelines
issued by the Central Government and Telangana Government.
According to the learned Senior Counsel, multiple FIRs. were
registered against the petitioners in relation to the same facts.
It is submitted that the petitioners were picked up on
19.08.2019 after they had attended the matter in Delhi High
Court bearing Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 36962 of
2019 in Writ Petition (C) No. 8332 of 2019 and kept the car
Hyundai Creta registered at Delhi bearing No. DL 3C CP 8623 in
the name of the 2nd petitioner in possession and custody at
Mayur Vihar Police Station, Delhi and took both of them to
Hyderabad. It is submitted that Habeas Corpus Petition ie.
Writ Petition (Crl) No. 2316 of 2019 was filed but due to
subsequent events, the petitioners were arrested by the officers
of the 4th respondent in Crime No. 572 of 2019 dated
09.08.2019. Learned counsel further submits that the 4th
respondent directed Respondents 5 to 10 to issue notice under
Section 41(A) Cr.P.C. to the distributors of the company and
accordingly, 500 notices every day are being issued by the
officers of the 4th respondent and they are pressurizing the
distributors to complain against the company and there is lot of
harassment to the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners have come
up before this Court with the above prayer.
4. By virtue of the amendment ordered in I.A.No. 1 of
2022, the petitioners are seeking to transfer the cases to the
Courts at Hanamkonda where C.C. is numbered as 2 of 2016
and pending before the I Principal Senior Civil Judge Court at
Warangal to deal as a single case and other FIRs., be treated as
a statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C.
5. Learned counsel submits that though each and
every victim has lodged different complaints, they cannot be
taken as different complaints as the nature of allegations in the
complaints is one and the same and against the same company,
same accused. According to the learned counsel, prosecuting
the petitioners by various Courts of different areas for the same
allegations is violative of Article 20(2) of the Constitution of
India. He submits that there are nine similar cases pending in
various Courts of different police stations, which are as follows:
Sl.No. FIR No. Date Police Station Under Section
1. 338/2008 5/8/2008 Hanamkonda, 385, 420 IPC. &
Warangal, S. 4,5,6 r/w 2(C),
Telangana 3 of PC &
MCSBA
2. 93/2017 21/4/2017 I Town, Adilabad, S.420 r/w 34 IPC
Telangana & S.4 of PC &
MCSBA
3. 180/2019 5/3/2019 Madhapur(Gutala) S.406,420,506
Cyberabad, IPC & S.3,4,5,6
Telangana of PC & MCSBA
4. 440/2019 8/8/2019 Gachibowli, S.406,420,506
Cyberabad, IPC. & S.3,4,5,6
Telangana r/w 2(c) of PC &
MCSBA
5. 572/2019 9/8/2019 KPHB Colony, S. 406,420,506
Cyberabad IPC and
S.3,4,5,6 r/w
2(c) of PC &
MCBA
6. 1122/2019 10/8/2019 Rajendernagar, 406,420,506 r/w
Cyberabad, 34 IPC. S.
Telangana 3,4,5,6 r/w 2(c)
of PC & MCSBA
7. 578/2019 25/8/2019 Meerpet, S.406,420 IPC &
Rachakonda, S.3,3,4,5,6 r/w
2(c) of PC &
MCSBA
8. 619/19 30/9/2019 Shadnagar, S.406,420,506
Cyberabad r/w 34 IPC. &
S.3,4,5,6 r/w
2(c) of PC &
MCSBA
9. 583/2019 25/10/2019 RC Puram, S. 406,420,506
Cyberabad IPC.
S.3,4,5,6 of PC &
MCSBA
It is submitted that all the cases are similar in
nature and series of complaints lodged by the alleged victims.
Therefore, in order to meet the ends of justice and also to avoid
conflict of judgments, it is necessary to club all the cases and
try along with Crime No. 338 of 2008 of Hanamkonda Police
Station which is numbered as C.C.No. 2 of 2016 pending before
the I Principal Senior Civil Judge Court at Warangal. He also
relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex court in Radhe
Shyam v. The State of Telangana (W.P.(Crl.) No. 75 of 2020,
dated 12.05.2022), wherein it is held as below:
" The FIRs. referred to above, filed in different States under the Indian Penal Code can proceed as one set of complaint treating FIR No. 710/2018 dated 30.08.2018 as the principal FIR. The FIRs. registered subsequently in the State of Telangana and other States (except States of Haryana, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra) shall stand clubbed with the stated FIR No. 710/2018 and treated as statement under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The investigating officer in criminal case arising from FIR No. 710/2018 will be free t file supplementary charge sheet after collation of all the records concerning other FIRs, which are clubbed in terms of this order. In the event the Investigating Officer in other FIRs. had already
filed the police report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the concerned Court and the concerned Court had taken cognizance thereof, the said FIRs. and criminal cases would also stand transferred and merged / clubbed along with case arising from FIR No. 710/2018, to be proceeded with in accordance with law. The investigating officer in the stated case (principal case) will be free to file supplementary charge sheet on the basis of material collated during investigation of other FIRs."
6. A counter-affidavit is filed stating that the
petitioners are not falsely implicated by the police and basing on
different complaints of victims, they have registered the
complaints. It is stated that different case are registered at
different places and all of them cannot be clubbed together and
they cannot be transferred to a single investigating agency to
treat it as a single case and it is stated that such relief cannot
be granted.
7. The admitted facts in this case are : basing on a
similar set of allegation, several cases are registered against the
petitioners. Except three cases, all the cases are in Cyberabad.
Only one case is at Rachakonda which is under investigation.
Whereas in FIR No. 338 of 2018 and 93 of 2017, investigation is
completed and charge sheet is also filed. As rightly pointed out
by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, as
per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Radhe
Shyam's case, at several places if the cases are registered,
definitely, it would cause lot of hardship to the accused where
he has to attend one Court after the other. Apart from that
there is every likelihood of conflicting judgments. In all these
cases, the petitioners have to attend the Courts and this process
itself becomes a punishment. Already charge sheet is filed
before the Court at Warangal. It would be appropriate to treat
all the FIRs. as statements under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and after
the investigation is completed, the police can file a
supplementary charge sheet before the Principal Senior Civil
Judge at Warangal in C.C.No. 2 of 2016.
8. Hence, the Writ Petition is allowed. Crime No. 180
of 2019 on the file of Madhapur (Guttala) Police Station, Crime
No. 440 of 2019 of Gachibowli Police Station, Crime No. 572 of
2019 of KPHB Colony Police Station, Crime No. 1122 of 2019 of
Rajendernagar Police Station, Crime No. 619 of 2019 of
Shadnagar Police Station, Crime No. 583 of 2019 of RC Puram
Police Station, Crime No. 578 of 2019 of Meerpet Police Station
shall be transferred to the Economic Offences Wing, Cyberabad.
As already investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed
i.e. C.C.No. 2 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil
Judge, Warangal, all these FIRs. shall be treated as a statement
under Section 161 Cr.P.C. and after conducting investigation in
the other crimes, police can file a supplementary charge sheet
before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal in C.C.No. 2 of
2016.
9. The Miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand
automatically closed.
-----------------------------------
LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J 01st August 2022
ksld
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!