Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2075 Tel
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2022
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU
C.R.P. No. 3897 of 2018
Date : 21.04.2022
Between:
Petitioner
And
Respondents
The Court made the following:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU
C.R.P. No. 3897 of 2018
ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice P Naveen Rao)
This Court on 4.4.2022 after elaborately hearing the arguments
of learned senior counsel Sri Vedula Venkataramana appearing for
petitioner and Sri C.V.Narasimham learned counsel for respondent
reserved the matter for judgment.
2. Later, on 18.4.2022, learned counsel for respondent filed
memo enclosing copy of the interim order passed by High Court of
Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati in ICOM O.A. No. 2 of 2019 staying all
further proceedings in E.P. No. 39 of 2018 on the file of the Court of V
Additional District Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar,
Hyderabad.
3. In view of the above, today the matter is listed under the
caption 'for further hearing'.
4. It is seen from the interim order in ICOM OA No. 2 of
2019 and submissions made by counsel before this Court that against
award passed by the Arbitrator, ICOM O A No. 2 of 2019 was filed
before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, wherein
interim order was passed staying all further proceedings in E P No. 39
of 2018.
5. Two aspects are noticed. Firstly, this revision is preferred
against the order of Court of V Additional District Judge, Rangareddy
District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad, dismissing EP No. 39 of 2018 in ARC No. 1 of 2017. Secondly, much later, ICOM O A No. 2 of 2019
was preferred against the award passed by the Arbitrator before the
High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. Thus, by the time
ICOM O A No. 2 of 2019 was filed, E P No. 39 of 2018 was not
pending. However, the fact of dismissal of E P No. 39 of 2018 on
1.5.2018 was not brought to the notice of the High Court of Andhra
Pradesh while seeking interim order to stay all further proceedings in
E P No. 39 of 2018. This clearly shows lack of bonafides in
prosecuting the litigation.
6. Be that as it may, since ICOM O A No. 2 of 2019 has
already been preferred and matter is ceased by the High Court of
Andhra Pradesh, we are not inclined to continue the proceedings in
this Civil Revision Petition.
7. Civil Revision Petition is accordingly disposed of, leaving it
open to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as warranted by law
as and when High Court of Andhra Pradesh clarifies on the interim
order granted in ICOM O A No. 2 of 2019 or when ICOM O A No. 2 of
2019 is decided finally. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending
stand closed.
__________________ P NAVEEN RAO,J
__________________________ SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU,J
DATE: 21.04.2022 TVK HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU
C.R.P. No. 3897 of 2018
Date : 21.04.2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!