Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Raghavendra vs The State Of Telangana And 13 ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4385 Tel

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4385 Tel
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2021

Telangana High Court
M.Raghavendra vs The State Of Telangana And 13 ... on 16 December, 2021
Bench: B.Vijaysen Reddy
     HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

               WRIT PETITION No.31785 OF 2021

ORDER (ORAL):

Heard Sri Srikarunakar Kommireddy, learned counsel for the

petitioner, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, and

perused the material on record.

2. It is submitted that complaint was lodged by the petitioner

under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short

'Cr.P.C.') before the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge cum X

Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, Cyberabad. It was

referred to respondent No.5 - the Station House Officer, Bachupally

Police Station, Ranga Reddy District under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C.

and consequently a case was registered in Crime No.575 of 2020

dated 19.09.2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 447,

468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for

short 'IPC'). In the complaint, the petitioner alleged that himself and

one G. Siva Hari Prasad are owners of Plots bearing Nos.88, 89 and

90 (part) in Survey No.102 admeasuring 962 square yards situated at

Nizampet Village, Bachupally Mandal, Medchal - Malkajgiri District.

On 03.09.2020 at about 12.00 hours, respondent Nos.7 to 14 came to

the subject lands, trespassed into the same and threatened the

petitioners. On the complaint of the petitioner, the

Sub Inspector of Police, Bachupally Police Station, Ranga Reddy

District, has taken up investigation. He has examined witnesses and

recorded their detailed statements. He has also made a request to the

Sub Registrar Office, Medchal for furnishing certified copies of the

sale deeds in respect of the subject property and obtained the same.

(i) During investigation, it was found that as per the judgment

in O.S. No.759 of 2007, it was revealed that accused persons have

been in prior possession of the subject land. When some persons

trespassed and damaged the property of respondent Nos.7 to 14

(accused in F.I.R. No.575 of 2020 dated 19.09.2020), a case was

registered in Crime No.66 of 2008 with Kukatpally Police Station for

the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 and 506 of IPC.

(ii) It is submitted that the petitioners and some others are

involved in Crime No.504 of 2020 for the offences punishable under

Sections 447, 427 and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC, wherein

investigation was completed and charge sheet was filed in the said

case against the petitioners and others and trial is pending in C.C.

No.2124 of 2021 on the file of the learned X Additional Metropolitan

Sessions Judge, Kukatpally.

(iii) The petitioner, in fact, filed suit in O.S. No.26 of 2021

before the learned XVI Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy

District at Malkajgiri.

(iv) In Crime No.575 of 2020, investigation was completed,

permission was taken from the Assistant Commissioner of Police,

Kukatpally Division, Cyberabad, vide proceedings No.1361/ACP-

KP/CYB/2021 dated 31.10.2021, to refer the case as 'false'.

After serving notice to the complainant through post on 02.12.2021,

final report was filed under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. as 'false' was filed

on 02.12.2021 before the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge cum

X Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, Cyberabad vide

IW No.7589 of 2021.

3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home

submits that if the petitioner has any grievance regarding filing of

final report, he may be directed to file protest petition before the

concerned Court.

4. In view of the fact that closure report has been filed treating

the case as false, this Court does not have any other option except to

permit the petitioner to avail remedies available under law either by

filing protest petition before the Court concerned or to avail any other

remedies available under law.

5. With the observations as above, the writ petition is closed, at

the stage of admission itself. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in

the writ petition stand closed.

______________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J December 16, 2021.

PV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter