Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

P.Vijay N Raju And 4 Others vs The State Of Telangana And 8 Others
2021 Latest Caselaw 4284 Tel

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4284 Tel
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021

Telangana High Court
P.Vijay N Raju And 4 Others vs The State Of Telangana And 8 Others on 13 December, 2021
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, A.Rajasheker Reddy
 THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
                         AND
       HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

                    WRIT APPEAL No.167 of 2021


JUDGMENT :(per Hon'ble Sri Justice A.Rajasheker Reddy)

       This Writ Appeal is filed against order dated 27.04.2021 in

W.P.No.12127 of 2020, wherein and whereby the learned Single Judge

dismissed the Writ Petition filed challenging the survey notices dated

29.07.2020, which were issued proposing to conduct survey on

05.08.2020 in respect of land in Sy.Nos.134 to 136 of Kondapur

Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, on the

applications made by respondent Nos. 7 and 8.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. A perusal of the impugned order dated 27.04.2021 passed by the

learned Single Judge goes to show that on the applications made by

the respondent Nos.7 and 8, the 5th respondent had issued notices

dated 29.07.2020 for conducting survey in respect of land in

Sy.Nos.134 to 136 of Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga

Reddy District on 05.08.2020 at 11.00 a.m and also for its

demarcation. The respondents 7 to 9 are claiming to be the owners

and possessors of different extents of land in Sy.Nos.134 to 136 of

Kondapur Village. The appellants are claiming to be the owners of land

to an extent of Acs.1.26 guntas in Sy.No.176 (part) of Kondapur village,

having purchased the same under registered sale deed dated

31.07.2006.

4. The facts of the case revealed that the land claimed by the

appellants is totally different and located in different survey number

with that of the land claimed by the respondents 7 to 9 of Kondapur

village. The land/property, in which survey is to be conducted by the

respondents 7 to 9 is located in Sy.Nos.134 to 136 of Kondapur Village

and whereas the land/property claimed by the appellants is situated in

Sy.No.176 (part) of Kondapur Village. It is not stated anywhere in the

affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the land in which

survey is to be conducted belongs to the appellants or that they are

having substantial interest over the subject site and that if the survey

is conducted, the same would adversely affect their rights over the

property. Since the appellants are not having any right over the land of

the respondents 7 to 9, they cannot oppose conducting of survey.

5. That apart, in the counter affidavit filed by the 7th respondent, it

is categorically stated that he is not claiming any right over the land

owned by the appellants in Sy.No.176(part) of Kondapur village.

Therefore, the appellants cannot have any objection in conducting

survey in respect of the subject property belonging to the respondents

7 to 9.

6. As rightly observed by the learned Single Judge that survey and

demarcation do not create title in favour of any person and the

appellants do not have locus standi to challenge the impugned notices

dated 29.07.2020. If the appellants have any objection, they are at

liberty to place before the concerned surveyor, after receipt of notice on

the date and time, fixed by him.

7. Learned Single Judge by referring to two judgments of this Court

in W.A.No.110 of 2013 dated 14.06.2013 and W.A.No.1003 of 2013

dated 16.07.2013, came to the conclusion that the survey cannot be

denied in respect of private lands by the survey authorities, as such,

no exception can be taken to the order of the learned Single Judge.

In view of above facts and circumstances, we are of the

considered opinion that no extraordinary circumstances are brought to

the notice of this Court warranting interference under Clause XV of

Letters Patents Appeal, as such, the Writ Appeal is liable to be

dismissed and accordingly dismissed.

There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto,

miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stands dismissed.

___________________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA,CJ

_____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J .12.2021 kvs

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

WRIT APPEAL No.167 of 2021

.12.2021

kvs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter