Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 76 Sikkim
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2025
Court No.3
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Record of proceedings
W.P. (C) No. 40 of 2020
LHAMU DOMA BHUTIA & ANR. ....... PETITIONERS
VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS
Date: 04.09.2025
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE
For Petitioners : Mr. Jushan Lepcha, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Government
Nos. 1 & 3. Advocate.
Mr. Yadev Sharma, Government Advocate.
Ms. Pema Bhutia, Assistant Government
Advocate.
Respondent No.2 : Mr. Bhusan Nepal, Advocate.
Respondent No.4. : Mr. D. K. Siwakoti, Advocate.
..........
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view
of the judgment dated 07.08.2025 passed by the Division Bench
in Writ Appeal No.9 of 2022 Tseten Palzor Bhutia vs. State of
Sikkim & Ors. this Writ Petition has become infructuous as the
issue involved is covered by the said judgment. In view of the
categorical statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner
this Court is of the view that the matter is no longer required to
be adjudicated. It is accordingly dismissed.
Judge
Index: yes/No to/ Internet: yes/No
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!