Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 66 Sikkim
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2023
THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
(Criminal Jurisdiction)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SINGLE BENCH: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No. 2 of 2023
Narayan Pradhan,
S/o Badri Nath Pradhan,
R/o Rungdung,
Rhenok, Sikkim,
Pin Code - 737133. ..... Petitioner
versus
1. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Rongli, Pakyong District,
Sikkim,
Pin - 737101.
2. Mrs. Geeta Pradhan,
W/o Ganga Ram Rai,
Aged about 43 years,
R/o Namthang Palitam, Sikkim
Pin - 737132.
3. Mrs. Gayatri Pradhan,
W/o Moni Raj Pradhan,
Aged about 40 years,
R/o Rungdung, Rhenock, Sikkim
PIN-737133.
4. Mrs. Preeti Pradhan,
W/o Buntu Bhutia,
Aged about 37 years,
R/o Rumtek, Sikkim
PIN-737135. ..... Respondents
Petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
Mr. B. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate for
the petitioner.
Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Additional Public Prosecutor for the
respondent no.1.
Mr. K.T. Tamang, Advocate for the respondents no.2, 3 and 4.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
Crl. M. C. No. 2 of 2023
Narayan Pradhan vs. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate
ORDER (oral)
30th August, 2023
1. The present petition under section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) is for setting aside the order
dated 31.3.2023 passed by the learned Sessions Judge (Special
Division-I), Sikkim at Gangtok. The order dated 31.3.2023 was
passed while examining a revision petition preferred against an
order dated 21.2.2022 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional
Magistrate, Rongli, Pakyong in exercise of the power under
section 145 Cr.P.C.
2. By way of I.A. No. 1 of 2023, the respondents no. 2, 3
and 4 have placed several orders passed by the Court of the
learned Civil Judge, Rongli Sub-Division. The same is allowed
since the documents are relevant. These orders make it evident
that the respondents have preferred a civil suit against the
petitioner herein with regard to the same subject matter.
3. Mr. K.T. Tamang, learned counsel for the respondents
no.2, 3 and 4, relies upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in
Mohd. Abid and Ors. Vs. Ravi Naresh and Ors.1, which holds that
once a Civil Court is seized of the matter, it goes without saying
that the proceedings under section 145/146 Cr.P.C. cannot
proceed and must come to an end.
2022 LiveLaw SC 921
Crl. M. C. No. 2 of 2023 Narayan Pradhan vs. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate
4. In view of the clear pronouncement of the Supreme
Court, the proceedings under section 145 Cr.P.C. must
necessarily come to an end. It is accordingly so ordered. The
petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, rendered
infructuous.
5. I.A. no.1 of 2023 also stands disposed of.
( Bhaskar Raj Pradhan )
Judge
Approved for reporting : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
bp
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!