Monday, 20, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Mahabir Prasad Agarwala vs Union Of India And Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 39 Sikkim

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 39 Sikkim
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2022

Sikkim High Court
M/S Mahabir Prasad Agarwala vs Union Of India And Ors on 20 May, 2022
Bench: Shri Biswanath Somadder
                                                                              COURT NO.1
                         HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
                                Record of Proceedings



                                Arb.P. No. 01/2022


M/S MAHABIR PRASAD AGARWALA                                 PETITIONER (S)
                                        VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                       RESPONDENT (S)


For Petitioner           :      Ms. Pritima Sunam, Advocate.


For Respondents          :      Ms. Sangita Pradhan, Asst. Solicitor General.


Date: 20/05/2022

CORAM :

      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER, CHIEF JUSTICE
                               ...

JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble, the Chief Justice)

This arbitration petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking

appointment of an independent Arbitrator and/or a Panel of Arbitrators, if

permissible, from the three names given in letters dated 12th October, 2021 and

1st November, 2021, of the petitioner for adjudication of disputes/claims, etc.

between the parties before this Court.

By an order dated 18th February, 2022, this Court had directed the parties

to exchange affidavits. Consequent thereto, an affidavit has been filed on behalf

of the respondents (Union of India & Ors.), although, no reply thereto has been

filed on behalf of the petitioner.

Perusing the affidavit filed on behalf of the Union of India and others, it is

noticed that the respondents have submitted that any retired Judge of this Court

or the Hon'ble High Court at Calcutta may be appointed as an Arbitrator in order

to adjudicate upon the disputes which have arisen between the parties.

Paragraph 5 of the respondents' affidavit is required to be noticed in this context

and the same is reproduced hereinbelow:-

"The respondents respectfully submit that the petitioner has selected and proposed the names of three arbitrators of their choice vide Annexure P12, which

Page 1 of 2 COURT NO.1 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK Record of Proceedings

is contrary to law and not acceptable to the respondents. The respondents further submits that any retired Judge of this Hon'ble Court or the Hon'ble High Court of Kolkata may be appointed as an arbitrator, if any, to be appointed in the instant

matter."

In view of the stand taken by the respondents, as reproduced

hereinabove, this Court appoints Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pranab Kumar

Chattopadhyay, a retired Judge of the High Court at Calcutta, as the Sole

Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties. He shall dispose

of the arbitral proceeding as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law.

The instant application stands disposed of accordingly.

(Biswanath Somadder) Chief Justice jk/ami

Page 2 of 2

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2024

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2024', Apply Now!

 
 
 
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz