Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pratap vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:12446)
2026 Latest Caselaw 3975 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3975 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Pratap vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:12446) on 16 March, 2026

Author: Praveer Bhatnagar
Bench: Praveer Bhatnagar
[2026:RJ-JD:12446]

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                        JODHPUR
      S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 451/2026

Surendra S/o Ram Kumar, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Sisay Kali
Rawan, Police Station Hansi, District Hisar, Haryana. (Lodged In
Dist. Jail, Bhilwara)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent
                              Connected With
     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15635/2025
Pratap S/o Late Shri Basir, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Panihari,
Police Station Barwala, District Hisar, Harayana. (Lodged In Dist.
Jail, Bhilwara)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Shiv Kumar Bhati
For Respondent(s)         :     Ms. Sonu Manawat, PP



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

16/03/2026

1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section

483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have

been arrested in connection with FIR No.626/2025 registered at

Police Station Pratapnagar, District Bhilwara for the offence(s)

under Sections 8/15, 29 of NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the

accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

(Uploaded on 16/03/2026 at 06:11:35 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:12446] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-451/2026]

further submits that the alleged quantity of contraband article i.e.

Poppy Straw recovered from the possession of the petitioners -

Surendra and Pratap is 19.470 Kgs. and 12.670 Kgs. respectively,

which is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioners are in

custody since 09.12.2025, the charge-sheet has already been filed

and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time,

therefore, the bail applications may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail

applications and contended that petitioners are habitual offenders

and against petitioner Pratap, seven cases have already been

registered, out of which six cases are of a similar nature, and

against petitioner Surendra, one case of similar nature has been

registered, therefore, the bail applications of the petitioners

deserve to be dismissed.

5. Considering the fact that the alleged contraband article

recovered from the possession of the petitioners is below

commercial quantity, the trial/investigation of the case may take

considerable time, therefore, without expressing anything on the

merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the

accused-petitioners on bail.

6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS

are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners

Surendra S/o Ram Kumar and Pratap S/o Late Shri Basir, in

connection with FIR No.626/2025 registered at Police Station

Pratapnagar, District Bhilwara shall be enlarged on bail provided

each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court

(Uploaded on 16/03/2026 at 06:11:35 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:12446] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-451/2026]

concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon

to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and

the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before

releasing the accused-petitioners on bail.

7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their

presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the

concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station

is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of

the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the

accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court

without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned

conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the

application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the

bail before the concerned Court.

8. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their

present address along with the mobile number to the concerned

SHO within a period of 7 days from their release and the

concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile

number. In case if the petitioners changes their address or mobile

number, they shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so

also before the concerned learned Trial Court.

9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for

its strict compliance.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 60-61/AnilKC/-

(Uploaded on 16/03/2026 at 06:11:35 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter