Priyanka Bohra vs Vidhya Devi (2026:Rj-Jd:2568)
2026 Latest Caselaw 574 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Priyanka Bohra vs Vidhya Devi (2026:Rj-Jd:2568) on 15 January, 2026

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2026:RJ-JD:2568]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 274/2025

Priyanka Bohra W/o Shri Ashok Bohra, Aged About 38 Years, Iind
F-483F,     Mruilidhar     Vyas        Nagar,    Near      Traffic    Park   ,behind
Aashram, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
                                                                       ----Appellant
                                        Versus
Vidhya Devi W/o Late Shri Babu Lal, Aged About 42 Years,
Outside Sheetla Gate, Behind Sen Bhawan, Bikaner, Currently
Residing     At     Iind-F-781,        Muralidhar        Vyas      Nagar,    Bikaner,
Rajasthan
                                                                     ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)            :     None present
For Respondent(s)           :     --



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

15/01/2026

1. The present application seeking leave to appeal has been

placed before this Court for consideration.

2. It is trite that the grant of leave to appeal is a condition

precedent for the admission of an appeal and such leave is neither

automatic nor a matter of right, but rests within the discretionary

jurisdiction of the appellate Court. The purpose of seeking leave is

to obtain the Court's permission to assail the impugned judgment

before the appeal is formally entertained.

3. At the stage of consideration of leave, the Court is not

expected to undertake a detailed examination of the merits of the

case. The scope of scrutiny is confined to ascertaining whether the

proposed appeal discloses arguable issues, raises substantial

(Uploaded on 16/01/2026 at 02:30:20 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:2568] (2 of 2) [CRLLA-274/2025]

questions of law or fact, or otherwise demonstrates sufficient

cause warranting appellate interference

4. Upon perusal of the impugned judgment, it is revealed that a

cheque was allegedly issued by the accused-respondent in favour

of the petitioner, which, upon presentation, came to be

dishonoured on the ground of "Exceeds Arrangement" in the

account of the accused. From the material placed on record, this

Court finds that reasonable grounds exist to permit the appellant

to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment.

5. This Court is satisfied that the proposed challenge is neither

frivolous nor vexatious and that the issues raised deserve

consideration by the appellate Court.

6. Accordingly, the instant application seeking leave to appeal is

allowed. The memo of leave to appeal shall be treated as an

appeal and shall be registered as such.

7. Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the respondent at

the time of hearing on the question of admission of the appeal.

8. Office is directed to proceed in accordance with law.

(FARJAND ALI),J 86-Samvedana/-

(Uploaded on 16/01/2026 at 02:30:20 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)