Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3169 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:10080]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4357/2026
Vimala W/o Shree Govind Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Kapoordi, District Barmer, Rajasthan 344026.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, AU Small Finance Bank, Branch Pwd
Colony Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. The Reserve Bank Of India, Through Its Regional Director,
Rambagh Circle, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
3. The Station House Officer, Erode Town, District Erode,
Tamil Nadu.
4. The Station House Officer, Cyber Crime, District City
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh.
5. The Station House Officer, Kolkata South West Division,
West Bengal.
6. The Station House Officer, P.s. Rjy Iii Town Ups, District
East Godavari, Andra Pradesh.
7. The Station House Officer, P.s. Cyber District, District Jind,
Haryana.
8. The Station House Officer, P.s. Erumapetty, District
Thrissur City, Kerela.
9. The Station House Officer, P.s. Yeshhwanthpura, District
Banglore City, Karnataka.
10. The Station House Officer, P.s. Tilkota, District Vijaypur,
Karnataka.
11. The Station House Officer, P.s. Murud, District Raigad,
Maharashtra.
12. The Station House Officer, P.s. Pandharpur Town, District
Solapur Rural, Maharashtra.
13. The Station House Officer, P.s. Nayanagar, District Meera
Bhayandar, Maharashtra.
14. The Station House Officer, P.s. Cyber Police Station,
District Alwar, Rajasthan.
15. The Station House Officer, P.s. Chennai Ccb District
Chenai, Tamil Nadu.
16. The Station House Officer, P.s. East Agartala, Tripura.
17. The Station House Officer, P.s. Khelgaon, District Ranchi,
Jharkhand.
18. The Station House Officer, P.s. Cyber Crime, District
Hyderabad City, Telengana.
19. The Station House Officer, P.s. Cyber Crime, District
Hyderabad City, Telengana.
----Respondents
(Uploaded on 25/02/2026 at 05:21:22 PM)
(Downloaded on 25/02/2026 at 05:56:26 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:10080] (2 of 3) [CW-4357/2026]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Kumar Jani
Mr. Bhagirath
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order 25/02/2026
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following
reliefs:-
In view of the above, the petitioner prays for the following reliefs:
(i) Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the freezing of the petitioner's bank account bearing No. 2302225848567533 with AU Small Finance Bank, Branch PWD Colony, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
(ii) The respondents be directed to de-freeze the petitioner's bank account and permit him to access his legitimate funds, except for any disputed amount, which may be kept on hold till the conclusion of the investigation.
(iii) The respondents be directed to provide a proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before taking any coercive action against his financial interests.
(iv) Any action taken by the respondents without due process of law be declared illegal, arbitrary, and void ab initio.
(v) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,
this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition
with a direction to the AU Small Finance Bank (Respondent No.1)
to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred
illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the
petitioner to make transactions from her bank account from the
remaining balance.
(Uploaded on 25/02/2026 at 05:21:22 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:10080] (3 of 3) [CW-4357/2026]
3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent - Bank
has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the
disputed amount, which the Investigating officer/Police alleges to
be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication
to the concerned Investigating officer/Police, to indicate the
amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the
instant order.
4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned
Investigating officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise
the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within
a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the
respondent - Bank. The respondent - bank shall thereafter do the
needful as directed herein above.
5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank
does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating
officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with
the instant order.
6. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand
disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 18-sonia/-
(Uploaded on 25/02/2026 at 05:21:22 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!