Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Priti Soni vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 2641 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2641 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Priti Soni vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 17 February, 2026

[2026:RJ-JD:8895]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1631/2026

1.       Priti Soni W/o Radheyshyam Soni, Aged About 43 Years,
         Resident Of Housing Board, Kumbhanagar, Chittorgarh
         Tehsil And District Chittorgarh (Raj.)
2.       Basant Kumar Heda S/o Sukhlal Heda, Aged About 55
         Years, Resident Of Bapunagar Seti, Tehsil Chittorgarh,
         District Chittorgarh (Raj.)
3.       Hemlata W/o Anil Joshi, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of
         Bapunagar Seti, Tehsil Chittorgarh, District Chittorgarh
         (Raj.)
4.       Manoj Kumar S/o Sukhlal Heda, Aged About 44 Years,
         Resident Of Bapunagar Seti, Tehsil Chittorgarh, District
         Chittorgarh (Raj.)
                                                                        ----Petitioners
                                         Versus
1.       The      State      Of     Rajasthan,         Through        The   Secretary,
         Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       The District Collector, Chittorgarh.
3.       The Sub-Divisional Officer, Chittorgarh.
4.       The Tehsildar, Tehsil- Chittorgarh.
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Surendra Thanvi.
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Sanjay Raj Paliwal, G.C.



             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Order

17/02/2026

1. Present writ petition has been filed with following prayers:-

"(i) The entry made in the revenue records as Peta / Pal, with regards to the land belonging to the petitioners may kindly be declared illegal and set aside.

(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:51:39 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:8895] (2 of 5) [CW-1631/2026]

(ii) The respondent authorities be directed changes the nature of the land of Khasra No. 521, comprised in Araji No. 1306/521 admeasuring 0.2250 hectare, Araji No. 1314/521 admeasuring 0.30 hectare, Araji No. 993/521 admeasuring 0.250 hectare, Araji No. 992/521 admeasuring 0.23 hectare, and Araji No. 521 admeasuring 5.046 hectare, from Peta to khatedari land of the petitioner in the revenue records.

(iii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in favour of the petitioner, may kindly be granted and

(iv) The cost of the writ petition be allowed in favour of the petitioners."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners

are having khatedari land, ad-measuring 5.046 hectares situated

at khasra no. 521, Tehsil and District Chittorgarh, comprised in

Araji Nos. 1306/521 (0.2250 hectare), 1314/521 (0.30 hectare),

993/521 (0.250 hectare), 992/521 (0.23 hectare), and 521 (5.046

hectare) (hereinafter referred to as "the land in question").

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that although

the land in question has always remained in possession of

petitioners and has been used for agricultural purposes, the same

has been wrongly recorded in the revenue records as Peta / Pal.

Upon becoming aware of said discrepancy, petitioners submitted a

detailed representation to District Collector, Chittorgarh, seeking

issuance of directions for correction of revenue entries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of

this Court to report prepared by concerned Patwari, Patwar Halka

Sahnava, Tehsil and District Chittorgarh (Annexure-4), wherein it

is clearly mentioned that although the land in question is entered

(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:51:39 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:8895] (3 of 5) [CW-1631/2026]

as land of Peta / Pal in the revenue records, the land is in

possession of petitioners and is being used for agricultural

purposes. It is also noted that the land in enclosed by a boundary

wall.

5. Said report of Patwari was forwarded by Tehsildar,

Chittorgarh, to SDO, Chittorgarh, vide communication dated

20.11.2025 (Annexure-5), communicating said fact.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore, prays that

appropriate direction be issued to respondents to record the

names of petitioners as khatedars of agricultural land in place of

Peta / Pal.

7. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the

submissions made on behalf of petitioner. It was reiterated that as

per report of Patwari as well as of Tehsildar, it is affirmed that the

land in question is being used for said purpose, however, in

revenue records, the said land is recorded as Peta / Pal.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also relied upon

judgment dated 29.01.2024 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No. 10490/2023 (Girdharilal Vs State of Rajasthan),

wherein in view of the undisputed mauka report, this Hon'ble

Court issued directions to make necessary corrections in revenue

record and to record the names of petitioners as khatedars of

agricultural land in place of Peta and Pal.

9. Learned counsel for the respondents are not in a position to

dispute the applicability of said judgment to the facts of present

case.

(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:51:39 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:8895] (4 of 5) [CW-1631/2026]

10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and have considered

the submissions made at bar and have also gone through record

of the case.

11. From the report prepared by concerned Patwari (Annexure-

4), so also communication dated 20.11.2025 (Annexure-5) sent

by Tehsildar, Chittorgarh, it is evident that the land in question has

been used for agricultural purposes for a very long time and even

the land revenue for the said purpose was also being paid. It is

also recorded that the land in question is enclosed by boundary

wall, is plain in nature, and crops of corn and sorghum are

currently standing over the land.

12. It is specifically reported by concerned Patwari that the land

in question is not being used as peta / pal. Said undisputed report

clearly shows that there is no water body in proximity of khasra

no. 521, and there is no question of said land being shown as land

of peta / pal. Said undisputed facts show that the specifications of

the land in question were wrongly mentioned as peta / pal.

13. In the considered opinion of this Court, the revenue entries

which were earlier made in the name of the petitioners are

required to be re-entered for Khasra No.521 as khatedari lands of

the petitioners in place of the 'Peta' and 'Pal'.

14. In view of the discussions made above, the writ petition is

allowed. The respondents are directed to enter the name of the

petitioners in revenue records as Khatedars of agricultural land

instead of 'Peta' and 'Pal'. The entire exercise shall be completed

within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a

certified copy of this order.

(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:51:39 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:8895] (5 of 5) [CW-1631/2026]

15. Stay application and all other applications, if any, also stand

disposed of.

(SANJEET PUROHIT),J 50-sumer/-

(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:51:39 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter