Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1404 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:5920]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civ. Contempt Pet. No. 8/2019
Ghanshyam Dass S/o Late Shri Tota Ram, Aged About 57 Years,
B/c Sindhi, R/o Sindhi Maholla, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And
District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Bhagwan Dass S/o Late Shri Tota Ram, B/c Sindhi, R/o
Sindhi Maholla, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District
Hanumangarh (Raj.)
2. Dharmender @ Kallu S/o Bhagwan Dass, B/c Sindhi, R/o
Sindhi Maholla, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District
Hanumangarh (Raj.)
3. Lalit S/o Bhagwan Dass, B/c Sindhi, R/o Sindhi Maholla,
Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh
(Raj.)
4. Harish @ Ashu S/o Bhagwan Dass, B/c Sindhi, R/o Sindhi
Maholla, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District
Hanumangarh (Raj.)
5. Vinod S/o Bhagwan Dass, B/c Sindhi, R/o Sindhi Maholla,
Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh
(Raj.)
6. Smt. Kamla Devi W/o Bhagwan Dass, B/c Sindhi, R/o
Sindhi Maholla, Hanumangarh Town, Tehsil And District
Hanumangarh (Raj.)
7. Commissioner, Municipal Council, Hanumangarh (Raj.)
8. Superintendent Of Police, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Jagga
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dron Kaushik
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
02/02/2026
1. The present contempt petition has been filed with an
averment that despite interim order dated 10.04.2009 being
operating whereby status quo regarding the suit property was
(Uploaded on 02/02/2026 at 06:28:22 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:5920] (2 of 2) [CCP-8/2019]
directed to be maintained, the respondents undertook the fresh
construction on the site in question.
2. An additional affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent
No.1 with a specific averment that the new construction as raised
by him has been demolished and an unconditional apology has
also been tendered by him. The photographs depicting the
demolition of the construction have also been annexed.
3. No counter to the additional affidavit has been filed on behalf
of the petitioner.
4. In view of the fact that the alleged new construction as
raised by respondent No.1 has been demolished by him and the
said fact has not been refuted, this Court is not inclined to proceed
further with the present contempt proceedings.
5. The contempt petition is hence, disposed of.
6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J 71-manila/-
(Uploaded on 02/02/2026 at 06:28:22 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!