Diler Khan @ Chhotu vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:20564)
2026 Latest Caselaw 7017 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 7017 Raj
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2026

[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Diler Khan @ Chhotu vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:20564) on 29 April, 2026

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2026:RJ-JD:20564]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                               No. 556/2026

Diler Khan @ Chhotu S/o Gani Khan, Aged About 30 Years, Ram
Pyau, Sojat City, District Pali (Lodged In Dist. Jail, Pali)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Avinash Bhati
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. SR Choudhary, AGA



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

29/04/2026

1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment

dated 06.02.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessioins

Judge, Sojat, District Pali in Sessions Case No.12/2019

whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum

seven years' SI under Sections 327 and 306 of IPC and

lesser punishment for the other offences under Sections 342,

451, 323 and 384 of IPC along with fine and default

sentence.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the trial court

failed to properly appreciate the legal and factual aspects,

resulting in an erroneous finding of guilt. Being the first

appellate court, this Court may reappraise the evidence. It is

further submitted that the appeal will take time for disposal,

the sentence deserves to be suspended.

(Uploaded on 01/05/2026 at 02:44:28 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:20564] (2 of 5) [SOSA-556/2026]

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for

suspension of sentence.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

5. The distinction between grant of bail under Section 439 CrPC

(corresponding to Section 483 BNSS)and suspension of

sentence under Section 389 CrPC ( corresponding to Section

430 BNSS)is well settled. While the former operates at the

pre-conviction stage, the latter comes into play post-

conviction and requires the appellate court to assess, prima

facie, the sustainability of the conviction and sentence under

challenge.

6. Upon conviction, the presumption of innocence stands

displaced; however, while considering suspension of

sentence, the appellate court is required to evaluate whether

the grounds raised in appeal disclose a substantial and

arguable case. If the material on record suggests that the

findings of the trial court may be debatable, the discretion

under Section 389 CrPC (corresponding to Section 430

BNSS) can be justifiably invoked. Where the appeal raises

issues which, on prima facie consideration, indicate a

reasonable possibility of success, including reversal or

modification of conviction, the sentence may be suspended

pending adjudication.

7. This Court is guided by the enunciation of law by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in Muna Bisoi v. State of Odisha

(February 16, 2026) , wherein it has been held that

prolonged pendency of criminal appeals, not attributable to

(Uploaded on 01/05/2026 at 02:44:28 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:20564] (3 of 5) [SOSA-556/2026]

the convict, constitutes a valid ground for suspension of

sentence. Reliance has also been placed on Kashmira

Singh v. State of Punjab (1977) 4 SCC 291 , wherein the

Supreme Court deprecated continued incarceration of

convicts for long periods during pendency of appeals,

observing that such practice would amount to a travesty of

justice.

8. It is equally settled that while considering such application,

the appellate court is not required to record conclusive

findings on merits, as that would prejudice the final

adjudication. A prima facie satisfaction regarding the

arguability and substance of the grounds would suffice. The

appellate jurisdiction being a continuation of trial, the entire

evidence remains open to re-appreciation. The court may

ultimately affirm, modify, or set aside the conviction, or alter

the sentence, depending upon the outcome of such re-

evaluation.

9. Additionally, even where conviction is sustained, the nature

of offence or quantum of sentence may warrant

reconsideration at the appellate stage, which further justifies

a liberal approach in appropriate cases. This Court cannot

lose sight of the fact that it is burdened with a large number

of pending criminal appeals, and the likelihood of their early

disposal remains uncertain. In such circumstances,

continued incarceration, despite arguable grounds in appeal,

would not be justified, particularly when delay is not

attributable to the appellant.

(Uploaded on 01/05/2026 at 02:44:28 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:20564] (4 of 5) [SOSA-556/2026]

10. In the present case, prima facie, this Court feels that the

evidence with regard to instigation to the deceased at the

instance of the petitioner is deficit in nature. The issues

raised are significant and merit consideration. If accepted,

they may result in acquittal. They require proper

examination and re-appreciation of evidence, with a fair

possibility of benefit to the appellant.

1. 11. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence

filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. (corresponding to Section

430 BNSS) is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence

passed by learned trial court, the details of which are

provided in the first para of this order, against the appellant-

applicant named above shall remain suspended till final

disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on

bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge and whenever

ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.