Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jaspal Singh Alias Pala vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 13948 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 13948 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Jaspal Singh Alias Pala vs State Of Rajasthan on 7 October, 2025

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2298/2025

1.     Jaspal Singh @ Pala S/o Harbhajan Singh, Aged About 38
       Years, R/o Khadur Sahib Police Station Goindwal District
       Taran Taran Punjab (Lodged In Dist. Jail, Chittorgarh)
2.     Gurvindra Singh @ Gora S/o Sukhvindra Singh, Aged
       About 32 Years, R/o Khadur Sahib Police Station Goindwal
       District    Taran        Taran    Punjab      (Lodged        In     Dist.    Jail,
       Chittorgarh)
3.     Fateh Singh S/o Baldev Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o
       Khadur Sahib Police Station Goindwal District Taran Taran
       Punjab (Lodged In Dist. Jail, Chittorgarh)
                                                                     ----Appellants
                                        Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                   ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)            :     Mr. Mangi Lal Vishnoi
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. Hathi Singh Jodha, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

07/10/2025

IN S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2298/2025:-

1. Admit.

2. Call for the record.

IN S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application for Suspension of

Sentence No.1809/2025:-

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned

Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the

narcotic substance recovered was below commercial quantity. He

further raises the ground regarding the non-compliance of the

(Uploaded on 07/10/2025 at 05:10:49 PM)

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-2298/2025]

mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, 1985. He further submits

that the applicants do not have criminal antecedents and the

applicants were on bail during the course of trial. He asserts that

the punishment imposed is 3 years rigorous imprisonment only.

He thus prays for allowing of application for suspension of

sentence.

3. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor opposes the

application for suspension of sentence and submits that the

learned Trial Court has considered each and every aspect of the

matter and after compliance of provisions of the NDPS Act, 1985,

the conviction order has been passed, and therefore, the accused-

appellants are not entitled for any indulgence whatsoever.

4. Upon consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of

both sides and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

case, including the facts that the recovered contraband is below

commercial quantity, applicants do not have criminal antecedents,

the punishment imposed is 3 years rigorous imprisonment, the

applicants were on bail during the course of trial and the chances

of hearing of the present appeal in near future being bleak, this

Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the

sentence awarded to the accused-applicants.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 430 of BNSS, 2023 (Section 389 of Cr.P.C.) is

allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned

Special Judge, NDPS Cases, No. 2, Chittorgarh, vide judgment

dated 23.09.2025 in Special Session Case No. 78/2017 (11/2017)

against the applicants Jaspal Singh @ Pala S/o Harbhajan Singh,

Gurvindra Singh @ Gora S/o Sukhvindra Singh and Fateh Singh

(Uploaded on 07/10/2025 at 05:10:49 PM)

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-2298/2025]

S/o Baldev Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided each

of them execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with

two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/-, each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for their appearance in this court on

07.11.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the

appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused-applicant(s) does/do not appear before the

trial Court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the

High Court for cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 1-charul/-

(Uploaded on 07/10/2025 at 05:10:49 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter