Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Divya Saran vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:51609)
2025 Latest Caselaw 16259 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16259 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Divya Saran vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:51609) on 27 November, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:51609]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3455/2025

1.       Divya Saran D/o Shri Banshi Ram Saran, Aged About 21
         Years, R/o Sarano Ka Bass Pal, Tahsil And Dist. -
         Jodhpur,rajsthan.
2.       Suresh Siran S/o Shri Gopa Ram, Aged About 26 Years,
         R/o Bhambuo Ka Bas Nandwan Salawas, Tahsil And Dist.-
         Jodhpur, Rajsthan
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department
         Ofhome Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The Inspector Of General Police Range, Jodhpur Raj.
3.       The    Inspector      Of     General        Police       Range,   Jodhpur,
         Rajasthan.
4.       Sho, Police Station - Boranada, Dist - Jodhpur,
5.       Banshilal S/o Jasaram, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
6.       Nitesh S/o Bansilal, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
7.       Ranaram S/o Jasaram, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
8.       Mahendra S/o Ranaram, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil
         And Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
9.       Mema Devi W/o Jasaram, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil
         And Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
10.      Babulal S/o Jasaram, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
11.      Mahesh S/o Babulal, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
12.      Mukesh S/o Babulal, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
13.      Ganesh S/o Jasaram, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
14.      Nikita D/o Ganesharam, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil
         And Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
15.      Rohit S/o Ganeharam, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And

                       (Uploaded on 27/11/2025 at 05:35:38 PM)
                      (Downloaded on 27/11/2025 at 09:13:12 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:51609]                         (2 of 3)                    [CRLW-3455/2025]


         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
16.      Anil S/o Papparam, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
17.      Sunil S/o Papparam, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
18.      Tilaram S/o Keraram, R/o Sarano Ka Bas Pal, Tahsil And
         Dist.- Jodhpur, Rajsthan
                                                                     ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Bhatraj Jogsan
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Hathi Singh Jodha, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

27/11/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they

apprehend threat to their lives at the hands of private

respondents, who are their relatives. The petitioners allegedly

approached the concerned respondent authorities, with a prayer to

be provided with adequate protection but no heed has been paid

to the request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed

on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of

(Uploaded on 27/11/2025 at 05:35:38 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:51609] (3 of 3) [CRLW-3455/2025]

U.P. reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the

petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to

provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 643-divya/-

(Uploaded on 27/11/2025 at 05:35:38 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter