Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Shree Karni Shiksha Sodh Sanshtah vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:48643)
2025 Latest Caselaw 15323 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15323 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

M/S Shree Karni Shiksha Sodh Sanshtah vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:48643) on 12 November, 2025

Author: Nupur Bhati
Bench: Nupur Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:48643]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 22140/2025

M/s Shree Karni Shiksha Sodh Sanshtah, Gopalpura Sujangarh
District Churu. Through Its Chairmen, Dr. Karnidan Charan Son
Of Shri Fushdan Charan, Aged About 50 Years. (Work Order No.
F-13/96 Dated 12-06-2013)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                      Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Medical And Health, Jaipur.
2.       The District Collector, Nagour.
3.       The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nagour.
4.       The In-Charge Medical Officer, Government Community
         Health Center Mithadi Tehsil Ladnu District Nagour.
                                                                   ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :   Mr. Kunal Upadhyay


               HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order 12/11/2025

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following

prayers :-

"i. by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent Community Health Center Mithadi may kindly be directed to make payment of final bill of awarded work in pursuant to the work-order dated 12.6.2013 (Annexure-

1) to the petitioner along with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of submitting final bill up to the date of realization of said amount. ii. any other order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deem just fit and proper be passed in favour of the petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an identical

petition being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12548/2025 (Rural

health Education Development Institute Vs. The State of

Rajasthan and Ors.) has been disposed of by a Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.07.2025, wherein it was

observed as under :-

(Uploaded on 12/11/2025 at 05:48:52 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:48643] (2 of 2) [CW-22140/2025]

"The petitioner was issued work order on 10.12.2015 i.e. Annexure-2. Petitioner has approached this Court with the grievance that petitioner's contract was found satisfactory and the amount to be paid by the respondent authorities admitted to be due, yet the petitioner has not been paid the due amount. It is contended that the respondents have paid no heed to petitioner's grievance in spite of number of representations filed by petitioner. Learned counsel relies upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of M/s Surya Constructions Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors: Civil Appeal No. 2610/2019,decided on 08.03.2019 and submits that in light of observation made by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, the respondent Municipal Board is under obligation to pay the due amount. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the respondent authorities within a period of two weeks from today along with photo- stat copy of judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Surya Constructions(supra), other documentary evidence and a certified copy of the order instant. In case, a representation is so addressed, the respondent authorities shall consider and do the needful and make the requisite payment to the petitioner in accordance with law as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks. In case the competent authority is of the view that the petitioner is not entitled for the payment as claimed, he shall pass a speaking order under intimation to the petitioner, against which petitioner's right to take legal remedies shall remain reserved. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly."

3. He further submits that the present petition may also be

decided in the same terms as in the said writ petition.

4. In view of the submissions made above, the present writ

petition is disposed of in the same terms as Rural health

Education Development Institute (supra).

5. Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J

195-/Devesh/-

(Uploaded on 12/11/2025 at 05:48:52 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter