Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhanwar Lal vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 15143 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15143 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Bhanwar Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 November, 2025

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2565/2025

Bhanwar Lal S/o Shri Birma Ram, Aged About 54 Years, Resident
Of Gourau, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur, The Then Patwari Patwar
Mandal Fardoud District Nagaur
                                                                  ----Appellant
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. Jai Kishan Suthar
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
                               Mr. Omprakash Choudhary



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

10/11/2025

IN S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No.2565/2025:-

1. Admit.

2. Call for the record.

IN S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

No.2092/2025:-

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on

record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that the

appellant-applicant has been convicted for the offences punishable

under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 201 of the IPC. He

submits that there is an allegation of demand and acceptance of a

sum of Rs.7,000/-, whereas the actual recovery effected is only

(Uploaded on 10/11/2025 at 07:23:56 PM)

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-2565/2025]

Rs.2,000/-, at the time when the appellant-applicant was posted

as a Patwari. He also submits that the appellant-applicant has

been sentenced to undergo three years' simple imprisonment, and

there are bleak chances of hearing of the appeal in near future.

He, therefore, implores this Court to allow the application for

suspension of sentence of the appellant-applicant.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application

for suspension of sentence and submits that the learned Trial

Court has considered the entire evidence threadbare and has

passed a detailed order for convicting the appellant-applicant,

therefore, the application for suspension of sentence in question

deserves to be dismissed.

4. Having considered the arguments advanced by both the

sides and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

case, including the facts that arguable points have been raised by

the learned counsel for the appellant, that the appellant-applicant

has been sentenced to undergo three years' simple imprisonment,

and there are bleak chances of hearing of the appeal in near

future, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for

suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant-

applicant.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 430 of BNS is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentence passed by the learned Special Judge (Prevention of

Corruption Act), Ajmer, vide judgment dated 30.10.2025 in

Special Sessions Case No.36/2014 (CIS No.63/2015), (State of

Rajasthan v. Bhanwar Lal), against the appellant-applicant

Bhanwar Lal S/o Shri Birma Ram, shall remain suspended till

(Uploaded on 10/11/2025 at 07:23:56 PM)

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-2565/2025]

final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on

bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

court on 11.12.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 67-devrajP/-

(Uploaded on 10/11/2025 at 07:23:56 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter