Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prem Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 9926 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9926 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Prem Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 20 May, 2025

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:24368]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3874/2025

Prem Singh S/o Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 70 Years, Resident
Of House No. 113, Masjid Road, Kumbha Nagar, Chittorgarh.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Home
         Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.       The Superintendent Of Police, Chittorgarh.
4.       The Director Pension, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
5.       The Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Khet Singh Rajpurohit
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Raj Singh Bhati and
                                Mr. Samarjeet Singh Bhati for
                                Mr. Rituraj Singh Bhati, G.C.
                                Mr. Mahaveer Pareek, AGC



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

20/05/2025

The present writ petition has been filed with the following

prayers:-

"a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to pay all the service benefits and retiral benefits including leave encashment amount, gratuity and pension without prejudice to the pendency of criminal appeal.

b) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may kindly be directed to release the entire gratuity amount and pay the remaining salary of the suspension period.

[2025:RJ-JD:24368] (2 of 3) [CW-3874/2025]

c) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to prepare the final PPO after fixation and regularization of his pension case in view of the order dated 03.04.2020 and pay the all arrears with interest at the rate of 18% per annum till the date of actual payment."

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely

covered by a judgment rendered by this Court at Jaipur Bench in

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12437/2012 (H.R. Choudhary Vs.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur and Ors.) decided on

27.01.2017 in the following terms:-

"A superannuated employee has no other source of income. Any deprivation of superannuation benefits therefore has serious consequences for the retired employee and his family. He may have to garner resources at this stage at considerable cost to maintain his standard of living or alternately be forced to reduce his standard of living for no fault of his. Pension and gratuity are not bounty but constitute a right to property under Article 300A of the Constitution which cannot be deprived except in accordance with law.

The withholding of full pension and gratuity is therefore held to be arbitrary and illegal. The Petitioner is held entitled to full pension from date of superannuation alongwith gratuity and other superannuation benefits, if any. The Respondents shall pay interest on Gratuity as provided for in Rule 68 of the Pension Rules or any statutory interest as the case may be. Relying on (1994) 2 SCC 406 (R.R.Bhanot v. Union of India) the Petitioner is held entitled to interest on the arrears of pension @12% p.a. from the date of superannuation till the actual date of payment.

The order to be complied with within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or

[2025:RJ-JD:24368] (3 of 3) [CW-3874/2025]

production of a copy of this order failing which the Petitioner shall be entitled to 18% interest. The Respondents in that event shall be at liberty to fix responsibility and recover the 6% interest from the erring official. The order of the Tribunal is set-aside.

The writ petition is allowed."

Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to

refute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the discussion made above, the present writ

petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to pay all

service and retiral benefits including leave encashment amount

and gratuity within a period of eight weeks from the date of

receipt of the certified copy of this order.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

21-Payal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter