Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhapu Kanwar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:21903)
2025 Latest Caselaw 550 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 550 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Dhapu Kanwar vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:21903) on 7 May, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:21903]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1267/2025

1.       Dhapu Kanwar D/o Roop Singh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o
         Village Jethaniya, P.s. Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District
         Jodhpur.
2.       Madan Singh S/o Prem Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o
         Solankiyon Ki Dhani, Nimbo Ka Gaon, Balesar, P.s.
         Balesar, Tehsil Balesar, District Jodhpur.
                                                                 ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Ministry,
         Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2.       The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters,
         Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3.       The Superintendent Of Police (Rural), Jodhpur (Raj)
4.       The Sho, P.s. Dechu, District Jodhpur.
5.       The S.h.o., Police Station Balesar, Jodhpur.
6.       The S.h.o., Police Station Shergarh, Jodhpur.
7.       Lakh Singh S/o Roop Singh, R/o Village Jethaniya, P.s.
         Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur.
8.       Khet Singh S/o Khinv Singh, R/o Village Jethaniya, P.s.
         Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur.
9.       Dalpat Singh S/o Birad Singh, R/o Village Jethaniya, P.s.
         Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur.
10.      Sumer Singh S/o Ganga Singh, R/o Village Jethaniya, P.s.
         Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur.
11.      Tulas Singh S/o Ganga Singh, R/o Village Jethaniya, P.s.
         Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur.
12.      Nem Singh S/o Ganga Singh, R/o Village Jethaniya, P.s.
         Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur.
13.      Mehtab Singh S/o Rewat Singh, R/o Village Jethaniya, P.s.
         Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur.
14.      Babu Singh S/o Ganpat Singh, R/o Village Khudiyala P.s.
         Balesar, Tehsil Balesar, District Jodhpur.
15.      Jabbar Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, R/o Village Bhalu, P.s.
         Shergarh, Tehsil Shergarh, District Jodhpur.
16.      Girdhar Singh S/o Not Known, R/o Tehsil Shergarh,

                     (Downloaded on 08/05/2025 at 09:44:19 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:21903]                   (2 of 3)                      [CRLW-1267/2025]


         District Jodhpur.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Madan Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Narendra Singh Chandawat, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

07/05/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are

their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned

respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with

adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so

far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed

on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners

for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide

protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

[2025:RJ-JD:21903] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1267/2025]

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 242-divya/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter