Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 428 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:21755]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 345/2024
Nikhil Dhandiya S/o Satay Narayan Ji, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Behind Mahalaxmi School, Surajpol, Jalori Gate, Jodhpur.
----Appellant
Versus
Deepak S/o Joga Ram, R/o Lala Lajpat Ray Colony, Chopasani
Road, Ward No. 18, Jodhpur, Second Address Infront Of Big
Bazar, Food Junction, Olympic Road, Jodhpur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Deepak Chouhan
Mr. Rajesh Poonawat
For Respondent(s) : -
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
06/05/2025
1. Upon perusal of the judgment impugned, it is revealing that
a cheque was allegedly given by the accused-respondent to the
petitioner, which upon presentation got dishonoured with the
remark of "Drawer's Signature Differs". There seems reasonable
grounds to allow the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the
impugned judgment.
2. Accordingly, the instant application seeking leave to appeal is
allowed. The memo of leave to appeal application shall be treated
and registered as an appeal.
3. Office to proceed.
(FARJAND ALI),J 44-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!