Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 419 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:21730]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1248/2025
1. Kavita D/o Gunesh Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o
Village Telpura, Borimada, Tehsil Marwar Junction, District
Pali (Raj.)
2. Shetan Singh S/o Sardar Singh,, Aged About 24 Years, R/
o Village Saran, Tehsil Marwar Junction, District Pali,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Raj., Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Pali
3. The Sho, Police Station Siriyari, Pali (Raj.)
4. Gunesh Singh S/o Gop Singh, Residing At Telpura,
Borimada, Tehsil Marwar Junction, District Pali (Raj.)
5. Keli Devi Spouse/o Gunesh Singh, Residing At Telpura,
Borimada, Tehsil Marwar Junction, District Pali (Raj.)
6. Narayan Singh S/o Dol Singh, Residing At Telpura,
Borimada, Tehsil Marwar Junction, District Pali (Raj.)
7. Chiman Singh S/o Tej Singh, Residing At Telpura,
Borimada, Tehsil Marwar Junction, District Pali (Raj.)
8. Bhanwar Singh S/o Pukh Singh,, Residing At Madiya,
Borimada, P.s. Siriyari, District Pali (Raj.).
9. Om Singh S/o Mohan Singh, Residing At Madiya,
Borimada, P.s. Siriyari, District Pali (Raj.).
10. Bhom Singh S/o Keshar Singh, Residing At Madiya,
Borimada, P.s. Siriyari, District Pali (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parwat Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
06/05/2025
[2025:RJ-JD:21730] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1248/2025]
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the
prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 222-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!