Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lalu Ram Dangi vs Sarita Bhatnagar (2025:Rj-Jd:23537)
2025 Latest Caselaw 1373 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1373 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Lalu Ram Dangi vs Sarita Bhatnagar (2025:Rj-Jd:23537) on 15 May, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Garg
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg
[2025:RJ-JD:23537]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
            S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1274/2023
Lalu Ram Dangi S/o Late Shri Megha Dangi, Aged About 63
Years, Residing At Village Nauwa, Tehsil Mavli, District Udaipur,
Rajasthan.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       Sarita Bhatnagar W/o Shri Prafful Bhatnagar, Residing At
         05, Chitrakoot Marg, Near Mahila Mandal Girls School,
         Surajpole Police Station, District- Udaipur, Rajasthan.
2.       State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Dr. Mohit Singhvi assisted by
                                Mr. Vishwas Khatri
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG
                                with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat
                                Mr. Jasraj Singh for R.1


          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Judgment

15/05/2025

This revision petition has been filed against the judgment

dated 19.08.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, District Udaipur in Criminal

Appeal No.81/2023 by which, the appeal filed by the petitioner

was dismissed and the judgment dated 18.02.2021 passed by the

learned Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act Cases), No.2, District

Udaipur, in Criminal Case No.245/2020 convicting and sentencing

the petitioner for offence under Section 138 N.I. Act has been

affirmed. The petitioner was sentenced to undergo one year's

simple imprisonment along with fine in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/-.

In default of payment of fine, the petitioner was sentenced to

undergo one month simple imprisonment.

[2025:RJ-JD:23537] (2 of 3) [CRLR-1274/2023]

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

and complainant-respondent No.1 have entered into a compromise

in the spirit of Lok Adalat. Counsel for the petitioner further

submits that he has already deposited Rs.70,000/- before the trial

court in compliance of the order dated 04.10.2023 passed by this

Court. Additionally, counsel for the petitioner has also handed-

over a demand draft for a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to learned counsel

for the respondent No.1/complainant, which has duly been

accepted. It is thus prayed that, in view of the compromise and

full payment, the sentence of imprisonment awarded to the

petitioner may be set aside.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1/complainant concurs

with the fact of compromise stated by the counsel for the

petitioner and also affirms the fact that the petitioner has

complied with the order dated 04.10.2023 passed by this Court.

I have considered the arguments advanced by counsel for

the parties and perused the compromise deed.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

since the parties have settled their dispute and

respondent/complainant has accepted the sum towards full and

final settlement of dispute on the satisfaction of the respondent

No.1/complainant and in the light of provisions of Section 147 of

NI Act and in view of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in

the case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. reported in

2010 (5) SCC 663, the sentence awarded to the petitioner for

offence under Section 138 NI Act is liable to be set aside.

[2025:RJ-JD:23537] (3 of 3) [CRLR-1274/2023]

Accordingly, the conviction and sentence of imprisonment

awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act

vide judgments dated 18.02.2021 and 19.08.2023 is hereby set

aside on the basis of aforesaid compromise arrived at between the

parties. The trial court is directed to disburse Rs.70,000/- as

deposited by the petitioner before it in favour of respondent No.1/

complainant on an appropriate application being filed. The surplus

amount of Rs.20,000/- received by the respondent

No.1/complainant from the petitioner (in addition to the total fine

amount of Rs.2,00,000/- as imposed by the trial court), shall be

deposited by the respondent No.1/complainant before the

Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period

of one month from today.

The revision petition is allowed in the above terms.

Record, if received, be sent back to the trial court forthwith.

A copy of this order be sent to the Rajasthan State Legal

Services Authority, Jodhpur.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 18-mSingh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter