Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10227 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:25443]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1510/2025
1. Daulat Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 34 Years,
Padradi Kalan Kuseep District Barmer
2. Kamla Kanwar W/o Sh. Daulat Singh, Aged About 39
Years, Bhatiyon Ka Bas Village Govindpura Danwra Bawdi
Jodhpur Rural District Jodhpur
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary Ministry Of
Home Affairs Jaipur Rajasthan
2. The Commissioner Of Police, Commissionerate Jodhpur
Rajasthan
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Jodhpur Rajasthan
4. The Station House Officer Of Police Station, Osian District
Jodhpur Rajasthan
5. Lakh Singh, Village Dangra Sanchore District Jalore
Rajasthan
6. Tej Singh S/o Sh. Kishan Singh, Village Dangra Sanchore
District Jalore Rajasthan
7. Suha Kunwar W/o Bhairu Singh, Village Solankiya Tala
District Jodhpur Rajasthan
8. Mahendra Singh S/o Sh Tej Singh, Village Dangra
Sanchore District Jalore Rajasthan
9. Anjana Kunwar W/o Bharat Singh, District Jodhpur
Rajasthan
10. Sang Singh S/o Asal Singh, Villege Kheerja Tehsil
Shergarh District Jodhpur Rajasthan
11. Dungar Singh S/o Asal Singh, Village Kheerja Tehsil
Shergarh District Jodhpur Rajasthan
12. Mangu Singh S/o Dungar Singh, Village Kheerja Tehsil
Shergarh District Jodhpur Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishit Shah
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order 23/05/2025
[2025:RJ-JD:25443] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1510/2025]
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners
for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide
protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 210-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!