Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ali Hasan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:11835)
2025 Latest Caselaw 8160 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8160 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ali Hasan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:11835) on 3 March, 2025

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:11835]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1315/2025

Ali Hasan S/o Manjoor Hasan, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Pipar
City, Dist. Jodhpur Rural, Raj.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Naveen Bhati S/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 35 Years,
         R/o House No. 2045/3, Sector C, Chandigarh,raj.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Kshitij Vyas, on behalf of Mr.
                                Javed Hussain
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Shriram Choudhary, Addl. G.A.



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

03/03/2025

1. The instant criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed

under Section 528 of the BNSS for quashing of FIR No.260/2024

registered at Police Station Pipar City, District Jodhpur Rural for

the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

dispute in between the parties has been resolved through an

amicable settlement and now, there remains no controversy in

between them and the parties do not wish to continue the criminal

proceedings further.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the petition.

4. Heard, perused the material available on record more

particularly the nature of allegation and factual report submitted

by the learned Public Prosecutor which incorporates the fact that

[2025:RJ-JD:11835] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1315/2025]

the parties submitted a copy of the judgment passed by the Court

of ACJM, Pipar City based on the compromise in the spirit of Lok

Adalat to the Investigating Officer. The parties to the lis have

resolved their dispute amicably and do not wish to continue the

criminal proceedings and have jointly prayed for quashing of the

same. Some of the offences alleged in this matter are non-

compoundable, however, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] has

propounded that if it is convinced that offences are entirely

personal in nature and do not affect the public peace or tranquility

and where it feels that quashing of such proceedings on account of

compromise would bring about peace and would secure ends of

justice, the High Court should not hesitate to quash the same by

exercising the inherent powers vested in it. It is observed that in

such cases, the prosecution becomes a lame prosecution and

pursuing such a lame prosecution would be a waste of time and

energy that will also unsettle the compromise and obstruct

restoration of peace. This court is aptly guided by the principles

propounded by Hon'ble the Supreme Court and feels that where

the dispute is essentially inter se between the parties, either they

are relatives, neighbours or having business relationship and

which does not affect the society at large, then in such cases, with

a view to maintain harmonious relationships between the two

sides, to end-up the dispute in between them permanently as well

as for restitution of relationship, the High Court should exercise its

inherent power to quash the FIR and all other subsequent

proceedings initiated thereto.

[2025:RJ-JD:11835] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1315/2025]

5. Here in this case, though some of the offences are not

compoundable but the parties have settled the dispute amicably

and that is essentially in between the parties which is not affecting

public peace and tranquility, therefore, with a view to maintain the

harmony and to resolve the dispute finally in between the parties,

it is deemed appropriate to quash the FIR and all further

proceedings undertaken in pursuance thereof.

6. Accordingly, the criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed

and the FIR mentioned above, and all further proceedings

undertaken in pursuance thereof are hereby quashed and set

aside. If the petitioner is on bail, his bail bonds shall stand

discharged. The SHO concerned is directed to file a closure report

with the concerned Judicial Magistrate within a period of one

month from the date of receiving copy of this order.

7. The stay petition also stands disposed of.

(FARJAND ALI),J 31-Pramod/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter