Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1820 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28953]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5043/2025
1. Naveen S/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o-Chawandiya
Kalan, Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
2. Mangi Lal S/o Shadul Ram, Aged About 72 Years, R/o-
Chawandiya Kalan, Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
3. Champa Devi W/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o-
Chawandiya Kalan, Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
4. Bhundi Devi D/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o-
Chawandiya Kalan, Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
5. Papi D/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o-Chawandiya
Kalan, Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.
2. Durga Ram S/o Narayan Lal, R/o Bera Bokara Chawandiya
Kalan, Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
3. Otaramb S/o Unkar Ram, R/o Bera Bokara Chawandiya Kalan,
Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
4. Nathu Ram S/o Duda Ram, R/o Bera Bokara Chawandiya
Kalan, Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
5. Durga Ram S/o Ota Ram, R/o Bera Bokara Chawandiya Kalan,
Tehsil - Jaitaran, District-Pali, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Kamini Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
04/07/2025
1. The instant criminal petition has been filed under Section
528 BNSS by the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR
No.249/2025 lodged at Police Station Jaitaran, District Beawar, for
the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 324(5) and 351(2)
of BNS.
[2025:RJ-JD:28953] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5043/2025]
2. The factual report dated 03.07.2025. received by the learned
Public Prosecutor from the office of the SHO, Police Station
Jaitaran, District Beawar is taken on record.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material as made available to this Court.
4. This Court, upon a perusal of the case file and the factual
report, prima facie finds that the offences alleged to have been
committed by the petitioners are either triable by a court of
Magistrate and/or do not contain the maximum punishment of
more than seven years, and keeping in mind the provisions
contained in Section 35 BNSS (Sections 41, 41-A Cr.P.C.) as well
as the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case
of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar, reported in AIR 2014 SC
2756, the dictum of which squarely apply mutatis mutandis to the
present case, it is directed that in case, the arrest of the
petitioners is found to be absolutely necessary by the
Investigating Agencies, instead of affecting the arrest of the
petitioners at once, a prior notice of 45 days shall be given to
them so that they may exercise their rights. Needless to say that
the petitioners are not precluded from ventilating their grievances
before this Court or trial Court if occasion so arises at an
appropriate stage.
5. With the aforesaid direction, the misc. petition filed under
Section 528 BNSS as well as stay application are disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 53-Dinesh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!