Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pankaj Kumar Badera vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28376)
2025 Latest Caselaw 1678 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1678 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Pankaj Kumar Badera vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28376) on 2 July, 2025

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:28376]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12013/2025

1.       Pankaj Kumar Badera S/o Laxman Das, Aged About 34
         Years, R/o Jatiyo Ka Naya Mohalla, Word No-18, Shastri
         Nagar Barmer, Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor
         (History) At Government Collage Vishala District- Barmer,
         (Raj.).
2.       Bheemaram S/o Genaram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o
         Village- Kantaliya, Post- Gagariya, Teh.- Ramsar, Barmer,
         Rajasthan. Working As Assistant Professor (Geography) At
         Government Collage Vishala District- Barmer, Rajasthan.
3.       Mohanlal Tunduck S/o Kajodmal Yadav, Aged About 46
         Years, R/o Ladi Mai Ki Dhani, Niwana, Jaipur, Rajasthan
         Working As Assistant Professor (Hindi) At Government
         Collage Vishala District- Barmer, Rajasthan.
4.       Swaroop Singh S/o Chutar Singh, Aged About 38 Years,
         R/o 08, Gordiya, Gadra, Barmer, Rajasthan. Working As
         Assistant Professor (Rajasthani) At Government Collage
         Vishala District- Barmer, Rajasthan.
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Higher Education
         Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The Commissioner College Education, Block 4 Shiksha
         Sankul Jln Marg Jaipur Rajasthan.
3.       The Principal Govt. College, Vishala, District Barmer,
         Rajasthan.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Bheem Raj.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Piyush Bhandari for
                                Dr. Praveen Khandelwal, AAG.



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

02/07/2025

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present writ petition has been filed with the following

prayers:-

"(I) That the present petitioners through this writ petition humbly prays before this Hon'ble Court the direction

[2025:RJ-JD:28376] (2 of 3) [CW-12013/2025]

given to the respondents to continue petitioners as a guest faculty under the Vidya Sambal Yojna. (II) By appropriate writ, order direction the respondent be directed to not to replace the present petitioners with another set of contractual employee in the garb of fresh advertisement for July 2025.

(III) The present petitioners humbly prays before this Hon'ble Court to kindly allowed this writ petition in the light of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1474/2023 title as Ram Chaturvedi & Others V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors.

of Hon'ble High Court Jaipur Bench and in the light of DB SAW No.50/2025 titled as State of Rajasthan V/s Dr. Deendayal Saini and others."

However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners will be satisfied if a liberty is granted to them to file an

appropriate representation before the respondent-authorities for

redressal of their grievances and the respondents may be directed

to decide the same in accordance with law while keeping in mind

the judgments rendered by this Court as well as circulars issued

by the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case

such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and

decided by keeping in mind the circulars dated 17.11.2021,

26.07.2024, 18.03.2025, 20.03.2025 & 28.04.2025 issued by the

respondents expeditiously.

In view of the submissions made before this Court, the

present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners

to file an appropriate representation before the respondents for

redressal of their grievances and in case such representation is

filed, the respondents are directed to decide the same while

keeping in mind the judgments rendered by this Court as well as

circulars issued by the respondents at the earliest preferably

[2025:RJ-JD:28376] (3 of 3) [CW-12013/2025]

within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such

representation, strictly in accordance with law.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 53-SunilS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter