Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammed Ramzan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:5043)
2025 Latest Caselaw 5471 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5471 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Mohammed Ramzan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:5043) on 27 January, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Garg
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg
[2025:RJ-JD:5043]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
             S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 976/2024

Mohammed Ramzan S/o Shri Chhotu Khan, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Near Hasnen Charitable Trust, Sarvodya Basti,
Bikaner Presently R/o House No. 1/178, Muktaprasad Nagar,
Distt. Bikaner.
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                        Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)             :     Mr. Deepak Kumar
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. Pawan Kumar Bhati, PP



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

27/01/2025

Petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition under

Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. to assail the impugned judgment dated

24.06.2024 passed by learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Bikaner

(Additional Session Judge No.1, Bikaner) whereby the learned trial

Court rejected the application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. moved by

the petitioner for releasing the vehicle Motorcycle Hero Moto Corp

bearing registration No.RJ-07-RS-7653.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Public Prosecutor.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of his

arguments, has placed reliance on a decision of the co-ordinate

Bench of this Court rendered at Jaipur Bench in Prakash Chand Vs.

State of Rajasthan reported in 2010(1) Cr.L.R.(Raj.) 507. In the

aforesaid judgment, the vehicle and other articles were seized

[2025:RJ-JD:5043] (2 of 3) [CRLR-976/2024]

from the accused for carrying contraband of small quantity just

above the commercial quantity. It is in that background, the Court

has acceded to the prayer of the incumbent and recorded its

finding that solely for the reason that the vehicle and other

articles are likely to be confiscated after trial, conditional release

of the vehicle and other articles on Supurdginama and surety

cannot be denied and interim custody of the vehicle and other

articles can be granted to the incumbent on certain conditions.

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai

Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2002 (10) SCC 283 and co-

ordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in case of Prakash

Chand (supra) has held that conditional release of the vehicle

cannot be denied.

Accordingly, the instant revision petition is allowed and the

order dated 24.06.2024 is hereby quashed and set aside and the

vehicle Motorcycle Hero Moto Corp bearing registration No.RJ-07-

RS-7653, in question is ordered to be released on 'supardgi' till

the completion of the trial upon following conditions:-

(a) the petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court and shall give undertaking to produce the vehicle in the Court as and when required to do so.

(b) the petitioner shall get the vehicle photographed showing the registration number as well as the chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.

(c) the personal bond of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the bond of sureties shall further carry the photograph of persons identifying them before the Court which is with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them.

[2025:RJ-JD:5043] (3 of 3) [CRLR-976/2024]

(d) the petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of the vehicle and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make unidentifiable.

(e) the petitioner will not allow the vehicle in question to be used for any antisocial activities including for the purpose of carrying narcotics which may constitute offence under the NDPS Act."

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 120-MS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter