Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3704 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:319]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21579/2024
1. Shanti Lal Dhobi S/o Shri Bhagirath Dhobi, Aged About 50
Years, R/o Mukam Post Rajaji Ka Kareda, Tehsil Mandal,
District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
2. Ajay Bhai Dhobi S/o Shri Durgalal Dhobi, Aged About 50
Years, R/o Narsingh Dry Cleaner, Shahpura, District
Bhilwara, Rajasthan.
3. Phojmal Meena S/o Shri Bhuwana Ram, Aged About 52
Years, R/o Mukam Post Ghadoli, Tehsil Jahajpur, District
Shahpura, Rajasthan.
4. Dharam Raj Meena S/o Shri Soji Ram Meena, Aged About
44 Years, R/o Nathadand, Tehsil Jahajpur, District
Shahpura, Rajasthan.
5. Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Prabhu Lal, Aged About 46 Years,
R/o Mukam Post Ghadoli, Tehsil Jahajpur, District
Shahpura, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Education Department, Secretariat, Government Of
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner.
3. District Education Officer, Secondary Education
Department, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
4. District Education Officer, Secondary Education
Department, Kekri, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Shrimali
Mr. Harish Jangid
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order (Oral)
03/01/2025
1. Petitioners herein are before this Court seeking directions to
the respondents to give the service benefits, seniority and notional
benefit as was given to the candidates, who were selected /
[2025:RJ-JD:319] (2 of 2) [CW-21579/2024]
appointed for the post of PTI Grade-II pursuant to the
advertisement dated 03.09.2008
2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
covered an order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Jaipur Bench of
this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7283/2014 : Manoj
Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He submits
that the petitioners are sanguine that, in case they are allowed to
file a representation qua the grievance raised in the present writ
petition and the same is considered in light of the aforesaid
judgment, they will be meted out with favorable treatment.
3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits
of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with
a direction to the competent authority to decide the
representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the
petitioners, in accordance with law, keeping in view the
observations made in the case of Manoj Khandelwal (supra), as
expeditiously as possible.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 14-skm/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!