Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6855 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:7995]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3629/2025
Rafik Mohammad S/o Maksud Khan, Aged About 41 Years, 88
Chaukidar Mohalla, Nehru Colony Ward No.24, Gangapur, District
Sawai Madhopur, At Present Posted As Teacher Grade- Iiird,
Level Ii Subject English, Govt. Senior Secondary School Sanwa
Block Dhanau, District Barmer, Rajasthan. Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Rural And Development And Panchayati Raj,
Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
3. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
4. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
5. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education),
Barmer, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
6. The District Education Officer (Secondary Education),
Barmer, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
7. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Barmer,
Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.R. Godara.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order (Oral)
10/02/2025
1. Petitioner herein before this Court seeks appropriate
direction to the respondents to accord him all notional benefits on
[2025:RJ-JD:7995] (2 of 2) [CW-3629/2025]
the post of Teacher Grade-III (Level-II) w.e.f. the date of his
actual joining alongwith all consequential benefits.
2. At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioner that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court
at Jaipur in case of Om Prakash & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
& Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21214/2014), decided on
21.11.2017. He submits that the petitioner is sanguine that, in
case he is allowed to file a representation qua the grievance raised
in the present writ petition and the same is considered in light of
the aforesaid judgment, he will be meted out with favorable
treatment.
3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits
of the case, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with
a direction to the competent authority to decide the
representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the
petitioner, in accordance with law, keeping in view the
observations made in the case of Om Prakash (supra), as
expeditiously as possible.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 28-DhananjayS/Rmathur/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!