Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6479 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:6939]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 479/2025
Narendra Saran S/o Jala Ram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village
Kudi, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur. At Present Retired
From Executive Engineer Public Health Engineering Department,
Driling Division, Jodhpur, Milk Main Colony, Subhash Nagar, Pal
Road, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Kishore Singh Bhati S/o Gayad Singh, R/o Plot No. 66,
Khasra No. 84/03, Akta Nagar, Nandri, District Jodhpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhagat Dadhich
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, Dy.GA
Mr. R.S. Bhati, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
04/02/2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor and perused the order dated 04.11.2024 passed by the
learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.6, Jodhpur
Metropolitan, Jodhpur in Criminal Appeal No.465/2024.
2. Bereft of elaborate details, briefly stated facts of the case are
that the petitioner was tried and convicted for the offence under
Section 138 of the N.I. Act vide judgment dated 01.10.2024
passed by the learned trial Court. Aggrieved of the judgment of
conviction, he preferred an appeal before the appellate forum and
an application under Section 389 CrPC for suspension of sentence
passed by the court below also came to be filed.
[2025:RJ-JD:6939] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-479/2025]
3. Vide the order under assail dated 04.11.2024, the learned
court below has allowed the application under Section 389 of the
CrPC with the condition of depositing 20% of the compensation
amount as directed by the learned trial court. The grief of the
petitioner would be that in view of the mandate of law and the
judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Jamboo Bhandari Vs. M.P. State Industrial Development
Corporation Ltd. reported (2023) 10 SCC 446 there is no need
to direct the appellant to deposit 20% of the compensation
amount, instead thereof, 10% of the cheque amount may be
directed to be deposited.
4. In view of the limited prayer, the legal provisions and the law
enunciated in this regard by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, I deem it
appropriate to make a slight modification in the order dated
04.11.2024.
5. Accordingly, the instant criminal miscellaneous petition is
allowed in part and the order dated 04.11.2024 passed by the
learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.6, Jodhpur
Metropolitan, Jodhpur in Criminal Appeal No.465/2024 is modified
in the manner that now the petitioner would deposit 10% of the
cheque amount instead of 20% of the compensation amount as
directed by the appellate court within a period of one month. The
stay petition is also disposed of.
(FARJAND ALI),J 42-Taruna/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!