Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 17342 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:55235]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3726/2025
1. Prema D/o Bhugan Ram Harijan, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Village Somna Tehsil Deh District Nagaur Raj.
2. Khema Ram S/o Sh. Pukh Raj Harijan, Aged About 26
Years, Resdient Of Harijano Ka Bas Egyar Kasnau District
Nagaur Raj.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretariat Department Of
Home Affaris Jaipur
2. Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur
3. Station House Officer, Police Station Surpaliya District
Nagaur
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Kuchera District
Nagaur
5. Sonu S/o Pream, Resdient Of Village Asop Tehsil
Bhopalgarh District Jodhpur
6. Pream S/o Babulal, Resdient Of Village Asop Tehsil
Bhopalgarh District Jodhpur
7. Ravi S/o Pream, Resdient Of Village Asop Tehsil
Bhopalgarh District Jodhpur
8. Abhishek S/o Pream, Resdient Of Village Asop Tehsil
Bhopalgarh District Jodhpur
9. Vishnu S/o Chena Ram Mali, Resident Of Village Kurdaya
District Jodhpur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.S. Ojha, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
19/12/2025
1. The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
(Uploaded on 19/12/2025 at 03:38:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:55235] (2 of 2) [CRLW-3726/2025]
2. The petitioners both being major persons, claim to be in a
live in relationship. They submit that they are living with each
other against the wishes of their parents and thus, they
apprehend threat to their lives at the hands of private
respondents. The petitioners allegedly approached the respondent
police authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate
protection but no heed has been paid to the request so far.
3. The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
live-in-relationship agreement have been filed on record. Thus,
taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in
AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners for
directing the Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of Police
concerned to provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be
accepted.
4. The Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of Police
concerned shall have the matter enquired into and if so required,
appropriate protection shall be provided to the petitioners as and
when warranted. The Superintendent of Police/Commissioner of
Police concerned shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
5. The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 2-Tikam/-
(Uploaded on 19/12/2025 at 03:38:34 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!