Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajendra Singh Chouhan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:36875)
2025 Latest Caselaw 9548 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9548 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Rajendra Singh Chouhan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:36875) on 18 August, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:36875]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15016/2025

Rajendra Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Panne Singh, Aged About 57
Years, Presently Posted As Administrative Officer, Office Of
Superintendent Of Police, Pali And Resident Of Pali Marwar, Pali
(Raj.).
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.        State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
          Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.        The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3.        The    Inspector      General         Of      Police,    Headquarters,
          Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.        The Commissioner Of Police, Near Rotary Circle, Jodhpur.
5.        The Superintendent Of Police, Pali (Raj.).
6.        Shri   Prakash    Chand       Kumawat,          Presently    Posted   As
          Administrative Officer In The Office Of Superintendent Of
          Police, District Rajsamand.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Sanjay Nahar.
                                 Mr. Pranav Bhardwaj.
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Raj Singh Bhati on behalf of
                                 Mr. Ritu Raj Singh Bhati, Govt.
                                 Counsel.



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN

Order

18/08/2025

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although

the posting/transfer order dated 01.08.2025 (Annex.16) has been

challenged in the present petition vide which the petitioner was

transferred after being promoted from Additional Administrative

[2025:RJ-JD:36875] (2 of 4) [CW-15016/2025]

Officer (AAO) to Administrative Officer (AO), but he is now ready

to forego his promotion.

2. The learned counsel submits that the petitioner may be

permitted to forego his promotion in light of the judgment

delivered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions led by Smt.

Verma Lata Vs.The State of Rajasthan & Ors.; S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.8761/2025 (decided on 26.05.2025) & other

connected matters.

3. The learned counsel Mr. Raj Singh Bhati on behalf of Mr. Ritu

Raj Singh Bhati, Government Counsel appearing for respondent

Department raises an objection to the above submission and

submits that the petitioner had never opted to forego his

promotion and the present writ petition has also been filed

challenging the transfer order only. Hence, he cannot be permitted

at this stage to forego his promotion.

4. After hearing the counsels, this Court is of the opinion that

as this Court has already taken a view in Smt. Verma Lata

(supra) to the effect that any incumbent who after having been

provided the place of posting, joined in pursuance to the same,

would also be entitled to move an application in writing in terms of

Direction No. (i) and the consequences shall follow, the present

petitioner too deserve the same treatment.

5. In Smt. Verma Lata (supra), this Court while disposing of

the writ petitions directed as under:

"44. The writ petitions are therefore, disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The petitioners shall be at liberty to file an application in writing, exercising their option to forego the promotion, within a period of 15 days from now.

[2025:RJ-JD:36875] (3 of 4) [CW-15016/2025]

(ii) The application shall be filed in writing clearly indicating the option to forego the promotion. The consequences of the said exercise of option, in terms of Rule 33 of the Rules of 2021, would follow.

(iii) The petitioners shall, along with their application, be under an obligation to file a specific undertaking to the effect that they would be governed by Rule 33 of the Rules, 2021 and would not raise any grievance qua the same, in future.

(iv) The petitioners shall also be under an obligation to file a specific undertaking to the effect that they will not claim any monetary or other benefit of the promotional post on which they had joined in pursuance to order dated 17.12.2024.

(v) The petitioners shall further undertake that any benefit, if any, availed by them because of their joining on the promotional post, shall be refunded back by them whenever called upon to do so by the respondents- Authorities.

(vi) The decision on the applications as filed by the petitioners would be taken by the competent Authority positively within a period of four weeks of filing of the applications.

(vii) Till the applications as filed by the petitioners are decided, the petitioners shall continue on their present place of posting deeming them to be working on the post of 'Sr. Teacher', as they were working before being promoted.

(viii) Those petitioners who have been relieved after the orders of posting been passed, would also be entitled to file an application in writing to forego their promotion and the said applications shall also be decided in terms of the above directions. The said petitioners shall, till the date their application is decided, be entitled to be reverted back to their original place of posting i.e. on the post which they were working before being promoted.

[2025:RJ-JD:36875] (4 of 4) [CW-15016/2025]

Needless to observe that they would be reverted only if the said seat is vacant as of date.

ix) Those petitioners who, after having been provided the place of posting, joined in pursuance to the same, would also be entitled to move an application in writing in terms of direction No.1 and the consequences shall follow."

6. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed

of in the same terms and directions as passed in the case of Smt.

Verma Lata (supra).

7. Stay petition and pending applications, if any, stand disposed

of.

(MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 228-Mohan/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter