Pravin Kumar vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 4318 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Pravin Kumar vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 6 August, 2025

Author: Nupur Bhati

Bench: Nupur Bhati

[2025:RJ-JD:34693]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11816/2025

1.       Pravin Kumar S/o Sama Ram Meghwal, Aged About 48
         Years, R/o Vatera, Teh. Pindwara, District Sirohi.
2.       Pukh Raj Meghwal S/o Vagta Ram, Aged About 40 Years,
         R/o Kojra, Teh. Pindwara, District Sirohi.
                                                                      ----Petitioners
                                       Versus
1.       The    State      Of     Rajasthan,         Through        The   Secretary,
         Department Of Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan,
         Jaipur.
2.       The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Shirohi.
3.       The District Education Officer, Elementary Education,
         Shirohi.
4.       The School Development And Management Committee,
         Gram Panchayat Bhimana, District Sirohi.
5.       The School Development And Management Committee,
         Gram Panchayat Kojra, District Sirohi.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. B.S. Deora
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Digvijay Sodha



               HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

06/08/2025

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits

that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by an

order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of

Subhash Chander v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP

No.12299/2017, decided on 27.11.2017. He submits that the

respondents may be directed to consider and decide a fresh

[2025:RJ-JD:34693] (2 of 2) [CW-11816/2025]

representation of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid

judgment.

2. In view of the submissions made, without commenting on

merits of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed

of with a direction to the competent authority to decide the fresh

representation of the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law,

keeping in view the observations made in the case of Subhash

Chander (supra), within a period of thirty days from the date of

receipt of certified copy of this order.

3. Stay application as well as all other pending applications, if

any, also stand disposed of.

(DR.NUPUR BHATI),J

31-/Devesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)