Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Rajasthan vs Mahesh Kumar Sad ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 4285 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4285 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

State Of Rajasthan vs Mahesh Kumar Sad ... on 5 August, 2025

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:34598-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                    D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 744/2025

1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
         Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
         (Panchayati       Raj).      Government           Of        Rajasthan,    Jaipur,
         Rajasthan.
2.       Additional       Commissioner,             Rural       Development            And
         Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
         Jaipur.
3.       Chief     Executive         Officer,      Zila      Parishad          Dungarpur,
         Rajasthan.
                                                                         ----Appellants
                                        Versus
Mahesh Kumar Sad S/o Shri Heera Lal Sad, Aged About 45
Years, Village And Post Kanba, District Dungarpur (Raj.).
                                                                        ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)              :     Mr. I.R. Choudhary, AAG.
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. Pawan Singh Rathore.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Order

05/08/2025

1. Mr. I.R. Choudhary, learned Additional Advocate General

representing the appellants-State fairly submits that the

controversy involved in the present special appeal writ is no more

res-integra and it is covered by the decision rendered by a

coordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court in State of Rajasthan v.

Ramdev Mali ; D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.182/2025 on

08.05.2025, which reads as under:

"9. On this issue, we observe that the learned Single Judge while deciding the writ petition in the present case bestowed due consideration to the decision in "Giresh Dindor"

[2025:RJ-JD:34598-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-744/2025]

(supra) and observed that the decision in the case of "Sumer Singh" (supra) was not brought to the notice of the writ Court when S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12914 of 2021 came to be dismissed. We shall also indicate that the Special Appeal preferred by "Giresh Dindor" was dismissed without hearing him as no one appeared on his behalf even in the second round when the said Special Appeal was called out for hearing.

10. In the order dated 17th October 2022, the writ Court has referred to the decision rendered by the Division Bench in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6005 of 2013 with connected matters titled "Sumer Singh & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.". We see that this is not in dispute that the decision in the case of "Sumer Singh" (supra) attained finality after the Special Leave Petition filed by the State of Rajasthan vide Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.14536 of 2021 was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. This is also recorded in the order dated 17th October 2022, a copy of which is tendered by the learned counsel of the respondent, that the Department took a decision in its meeting held on 6th July 2022 as reflected in the communication dated 15th July 2022 that it shall not seek review of the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforementioned Special Leave Petition.

11. In the aforesaid state of affairs, this Court finds that the present Special Appeal is prima-facie bereft of merits. We have taken this decision also for the reason that the writ Court in the order dated 17th October 2022 held that "Ramdev Mali" has the same status similar to "Sumer Singh". We would also observe that judicial discipline and proprietary require that a judgment of the Co-ordinate Bench is accepted as binding by another Bench of co-equal strength and only course open to the latter Bench is to refer the matter to the Chief Justice for consideration of the matter by a Larger Bench if the latter Bench records its disagreement with the previous decisions but no such ground has been pleaded by the appellants in this case nor we see any reason to disagree with the decision in "Sumer Singh".

12. I.A. No.01/2024 is dismissed.

13. D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.182 of 2025 is, therefore, dismissed."

2. Accordingly, this special appeal writ is also dismissed in light

of the decision rendered in Ramdev Mali's case (supra) on the

same terms. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(SANDEEP TANEJA),J (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

26-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter