Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bena Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37970)
2025 Latest Caselaw 10853 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10853 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 August, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Bena Ram vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:37970) on 26 August, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:37970]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14297/2025

Bena Ram S/o Shri Goma Ram, Aged About 37 Years, Resident
Of    Meghwalo       Ki     Dhaniya,        Hari     Nagar,      Dhadhniya     Bhayla,
Panchayat Samiti Baleshar, District Jodhpur.
                                                                         ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Deputy Government
         Secretary (Group-I), Department Of Revenue, Govt.
         Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The Registrar, Board Of Revenue, Ajmer.
3.       The District Collector, Jodhpur.
4.       The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Balesar, District Jodhpur.
5.       The Tehsildar, Balesar, District Jodhpur.
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Hapu Ram Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG
                                     Mr. Sher Singh Rathore



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

26/08/2025

1. By way of filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the

following reliefs:-

"In the light of facts stated above and the grounds mentioned therein, it is, therefore, most humbly prayed that the instant writ petition may kindly be ordered to be allowed and:-

(I) That by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned notification dated 05.06.2025 (Anneure-15) issued by the Deputy Government Secretary, Department of Revenue (Group-1) Rajasthan, Jaipur for creation of new revenue village Dhadhaniya Kalla may kindly be quashed and set aside.

(ii) Any other relief to which the petitioner is entitled, may be granted in his favour.

(iii) The writ petition may be allowed with costs."

[2025:RJ-JD:37970] (2 of 3) [CW-14297/2025]

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

impugned notification dated 05.06.2025 issued by the respondent

deserves to be set aside as while creating new village

'Dhadhaniya Kalla', the respondents have not adhered to various

circulars issued by the respondents themselves directing that no

village shall be named after a particular person, religion, caste or

sub-caste. Learned counsel submitted that the revenue village

'Dhadhaniya Kalla' has been named after the grandfather-in-law

(Dada Sasur) namely 'Kalla Ram' of a member of Gram Panchayat

Dhadhaniya Smt. Gomti. He submitted that the circular dated

05.06.2025 naming new revenue village in the name of 'Dhadhaniya

Kalla' deserves to be quashed and set aside.

3. Learned counsel has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by

the co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of "Moola Ram Vs. State

of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.C.W.P. No.3470/2025".

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. This Court, upon a perusal of the case file, finds that the name of

the village in the present case was proposed to the State Government

by the revenue authorities after adhering to various conditions/ clause

mentioned in the circulars issued in that regard and some mere

resemblance between the name of newly created revenue village and

grandfather-in-law of one of the members of the Gram Panchayat

would not by itself render it illegal until and unless it is established on

record that the said member of the Gram Panchayat was in a position to

influence the villagers and revenue authorities to name the newly

created revenue village after one of her family members. It may be a

coincident that the name of the newly created revenue village chosen

by the public/ villagers and revenue authorities is similar/ identical to

[2025:RJ-JD:37970] (3 of 3) [CW-14297/2025]

the name of one family members of the member of the Gram

Panchayat. Thus, in the absence of any material available on record that

the revenue village in the present case has been named after a

particular person or under the influence of an elected representative,

this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned notification

dated 05.06.2025 issued by the Dy. Secretary to the Government,

Department of Revenue (Group-I), Rajasthan, Jaipur.

6. Consequently, the present writ petition as well as stay application

stand dismissed.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 15-divya/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter