Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12170 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:19699]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension of Sentence Application
No.738/2025
IN
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 807/2025
Mohan Lal S/o Shri Heera Lal, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of
Village Ussar, Ps Kelwara, District Rajsamand Raj.
(Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Udaipur)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Hitendra Singh
For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, Dy.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
23/04/2025
1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been
moved on behalf of the applicant in the matter of judgment
dated 17.04.2025 passed by the learned Additional Session
Judge, Nathdwara in Sessions Case No.01/2019 whereby he
was convicted and sentenced to suffer maximum
imprisonment of five years R.I. under Section 8/20 of the
NDPS Act.
2. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the learned
trial Judge has not appreciated the correct, legal and factual
aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous
conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be
appreciated again by this court. Hearing of the appeal is likely
[2025:RJ-JD:19699] (2 of 3)
to take long time, therefore, the application for suspension of
sentence may be granted.
3. Per contra, learned public prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused-applicant
for releasing the petitioner on application for suspension of
sentence.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties
and looking to the totality of facts and circumstances of the
case, more particularly the facts/fact that the hearing of
appeal is likely to take further more time and considering the
overall submissions while refraining from passing any
comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the
prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on
hearing of the appeal, this court is of the opinion that it is a
fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-
petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed
under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the
sentence passed by learned trial Court, the details of which
are provided in the first para of this order, against the
appellant-applicant named above shall remain suspended till
final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released
on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in
[2025:RJ-JD:19699] (3 of 3)
this court on 23.05.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till
the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
(1) That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
(2) That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
(3) Similarly, if the sureties change their addresses, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
(FARJAND ALI),J 199-Samvedana/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!