Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10984 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:17259]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7003/2025
1. Mukesh Paliwal S/o Shri Lachchhi Ram, Aged About 32
Years, Resident Of Neem Nagar, Badi Khatu, Nagaur.
2. Suman Devi D/o Ram Kumar, Aged About 33 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 15, Village Phephana, Tehsil Nohar,
Hanumangarh.
3. Sunita W/o Shri Arwind Kumar, Aged About 31 Years,
Ward No. 12, Village Ber, Near By Mandir, Bhadra, 3Jsl,
Hanumangarh.
4. Renu Bala W/o Shri Mahesh Kumar, Aged About 39 Years,
Resident Of Bajawa, Suro Ka Bajawa, Jhunjhunu.
5. Varsha Kumari Sharma W/o Shri Naresh Kumar, Aged
About 34 Years, Resident Of Bansi, Chittorgarh.
6. Jyoti Chugh W/o Shri Gulshan Kumar, Aged About 33
Years, Resident Of Ward No. 5, Village Kundalawala, 6Lnp,
Ganganagar.
7. Kamal Kumar Goyal S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Goyal, Aged
About 43 Years, Resident Of Gurjar Mohalla, Khilchipur,
Sawai Madhopur.
8. Nitu Kumari, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of 203,
Pilana, Near Govt School, Tehsil Kalanor, Rohtak,
Haryana.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Choudhary.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order(Oral)
[2025:RJ-JD:17259] (2 of 2) [CW-7003/2025]
03/04/2025
1. Petitioners herein are before this Court seeking a direction to
the respondents to grant notional benefits and seniority, as was
given to the candidates who were selected/appointed for the post
of Teacher Grade-III (Level-II) pursuant to the advertisement in
question.
2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
covered an order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Jaipur Bench of
this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7283/2014 : Manoj
Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He submits
that the petitioners are sanguine that, in case they are allowed to
file a representation qua the grievance raised in the present writ
petition and the same is considered in light of the aforesaid
judgment, they will be meted out with favorable treatment.
3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits
of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with
a direction to the competent authority to decide the
representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the
petitioners, in accordance with law, keeping in view the
observations made in the case of Manoj Khandelwal (supra), as
expeditiously as possible.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 7-/Jitender//-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!