Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Narendra Vaishnav vs Union Of India (2024:Rj-Jd:43348)
2024 Latest Caselaw 9302 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9302 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Narendra Vaishnav vs Union Of India (2024:Rj-Jd:43348) on 22 October, 2024

Author: Birendra Kumar

Bench: Birendra Kumar

[2024:RJ-JD:43348]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                 No. 1335/2024

                                           IN

                     S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1246/2024

Narendra Vaishnav S/o Sohan Das Vaishnav, Aged About 40
Years, R/o 6-D-17, Chandra Shekhar Azad Nagar, Dist. Bhilwara
(Raj.) (Confined In Sub Jail, Prabatsar)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
Union Of India, Through Ncb
                                                                    ----Respondent
                                 Connected With
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                 No. 1000/2024
                                           IN
                     S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1246/2024

Jakir Hussain S/o Mohd. Hussain, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gul
Ali Nagri, Opp Pareek Hostel, Dist. Bhilwara (Raj.) (Confine In
Sub Jail, Prabatsar)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
Union Of India, Through Ncb
                                                                    ----Respondent
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                 No. 1336/2024
                                           IN
                     S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1246/2024

Mohd. Iqbal Chipa S/o Yousaf, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kailash
Halwai, House No. 10, Tilak Nagar, Near Polytechnic College,
Dist. Bhilwara (Raj.) (Confined In Sub Jail, Prabatsar)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
Union Of India, Through Ncb
                                                                    ----Respondent


                        (Downloaded on 23/10/2024 at 10:15:34 PM)
 [2024:RJ-JD:43348]                   (2 of 3)                    [SOSA-1335/2024]



For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. B. Ray Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

Order

22/10/2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the prayer for

Suspension of Sentence.

2. Separate applications for suspension of sentence have been

filed by the applicants.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that 10 years'

rigorous imprisonment has been awarded for offence under

Sections 8/15 and 8/29 of NDPS Act, besides order of fine.

Applicants have already remained in jail for more than five years.

There is non-compliance of mandate of law as required under

Section 52-A of NDPS Act. There is no chance for early hearing of

this appeal.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for suspension

of sentence.

5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case

as well as the fact that the appeal would take time for final

disposal, the applications for suspension of sentence are allowed

and the sentence awarded against the applicants above-named by

the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases & Addl. Sessions Judge

No.1, Parbatsar, Distt. Deedwana-Kuchaman vide judgment dated

18.07.2024 passed in Sessions Case No.03/2020 shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the appeal provided each of them

furnishes bail bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of like amount

[2024:RJ-JD:43348] (3 of 3) [SOSA-1335/2024]

(one of sureties of territorial jurisdiction of trial court) to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Court with following conditions:-

(1) That they will appear in person before the trial court in the first week of November of every year till the appeal is decided.

(2) That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

(3) Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address(s) to the trial court.

7. The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused-applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J 52-54 - deep/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter