Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9191 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:42945]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16718/2024
Bherulal S/o Shri Bhagirath, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village
And Post Chiksi Tehsil Chittorgarh Distt. Chitorgarh (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary (Home),
Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan,
Government Secretariat Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal
Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. The Financial Advisor, Police Head Quarter, Rajasthan,
Jaipur (Rajasthan).
4. The Inspector General Of Police, Udaipur Range, Udaipur
(Rajasthan).
5. The Superintendent Of Police, Chittorgarh (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Jhajharia, through VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
21/10/2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, instead of pressing the
writ petition on merits, submits that the petitioner may be given
liberty to approach the respondents by way of filing an appropriate
representation in the light of the judgment rendered by a Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of S.B. Civil Writ
Petition No.3873/2019 (Amar Singh & Ors. V/s State of
Rajasthan & Ors.), decided on 20.12.2023. He prays that the
[2024:RJ-JD:42945] (2 of 2) [CW-16718/2024]
respondents may be directed to consider and decide the same at
the earliest.
3. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the
present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to
approach the respondents by way of filing an appropriate
representation along with the copy of the judgment passed in the
case of Amar Singh(supra) for redressal of his grievances. In the
event of filing such representation by the petitioner, the same
shall be considered and decided by the respondents at the earliest
preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of
such representation, keeping in mind the law laid down by this
Court in the case of Amar Singh (supra).
4. It is made clear that if the case of the petitioner is similar to
the case of Amar Singh(supra) then the same relief may be
granted to him and if the case of the petitioner is distinguishable
from the case of Amar Singh(supra) then the respondents shall
decide his representation by passing a speaking order strictly in
accordance with law.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 32-SunilS/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!