Monday, 08, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pushpa Bai vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:42196)
2024 Latest Caselaw 9023 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9023 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Pushpa Bai vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:42196) on 16 October, 2024

[2024:RJ-JD:42196]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 6052/2024

Pushpa Bai W/o Lt. Ramchandra Anjana, Aged About 50 Years,
R/o Veerawali, Ps Arnod, Dist. Pratapgarh, Raj.
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Khiv Das
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, PP


         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Order 16/10/2024

1. Under challenge before this Court is an order dated

14.08.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases,

District Pratapgarh in Criminal Misc. Case No.124/2024 (Special

Session Case No.106/2023), arising out of FIR No.152/2023,

lodged at P.S. Chhoti Sadari, District Pratapgarh, for the offences

under Section 8/15 and 8/29 of NDPS Act, wherein 700kg poppy

husk was recovered. Vide impugned order, release of the vehicle in

question (Tractor) on Superdari bearing registration No.RJ-09-RC-

9645 has been declined.

2. Briefly, the relevant facts as pleaded in the petition are that

the petitioner submitted an application under Section 503 BNSS,

2023 before the Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Sirohi, stating that

her vehicle, a Tractor Trolley (No.RJ-09-RC-9645), was seized in

connection with FIR No. 152/2023 at Police Station Chhoti Sadari,

District Pratapgarh, for the offences under Section 8/15 and 8/29

of NDPS Act on 26.05.2023.

[2024:RJ-JD:42196] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6052/2024]

2.1. It is averred that the registered owner of the aforementioned

tractor was one Pankaj Anjana, who sold the tractor along with a

trolley to the petitioner's late husband through an agreement to

sell dated 16.12.2022. However, her husband passed away on

15.03.2023, before the ownership could be transferred. It is

stated that a charge sheet has already been filed, and there is no

further requirement for the tractor in the investigation. The

petitioner is a poor and illiterate widow, and her sole source of

livelihood is agriculture, for which she requires the tractor in

question. Therefore, the petitioner seeks the release of the vehicle

in question through the present petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's

husband is a bona fide purchaser and she has no role to play in

the transportation of the contraband (700kg of poppy husk) which

was allegedly being transported in the tractor trolley.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the instant criminal Misc.

petition on the ground that vehicle is a case property.

5. Vehicle was impounded on 26.05.2023 and ever-since parked

in police custody and needless to say it is deteriorating by each

passing day and would turn into a complete junk by the time trial

is concluded.

6. Reference may be had to the judgment rendered by Hon'ble

the Supreme Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai

Vs. State of Gujarat, reported in AIR 2003 SC 638 and the order

dated 18.11.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

Criminal Appeal No.2005/2022 [SLP (Crl.) No.7280/2022) titled as

Sainaba Vs. The State of Kerala & Anr., wherein, the vehicle

involved in a crime under NDPS Act was directed to be released on

[2024:RJ-JD:42196] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6052/2024]

terms and conditions to be determined by the Special Court. In

view thereof, the instant Petition is also allowed. Adopting the

same reasoning as assigned in the judgment, ibid, this Court

deems it just and appropriate to release the vehicle in question in

favour of the petitioner on interim custody till conclusion of the

trial provided she furnishes a Supurdarinama and surety of like

amount to the satisfaction of the Court below.

7. In the parting, I may hasten to add that the learned trial

Court shall assess the authenticity of agreement to sell dated

16.12.2022 executed between the registered owner (Pankaj

Aanjana) and late Ramchandra Anjana (deceased husband of the

petitioner herein) before releasing the vehicle in question in favour

of the petitioner on Supurdarinama on usual terms.

(ARUN MONGA),J 61-DhananjayS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter