Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8972 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2024
[2024:RJ-JD:41965]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16859/2024
Bheenwa Ram Bugalia S/o Shri Moba Ram Bugalia, Aged About
45 Years, R/o B-75, Vikas Excilensi 3, Kardhani Yojana,
Govindpura Ward No. 11, Kalwar Road, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary,
Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Govt.
Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Government Of
Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The Joint Director, School Education, Ajmer Zone, Ajmer.
4. The District Education Officer (Head Quarter), Secondary
Education, Pali, District Pali.
5. The District Education Officer (Head Quarter), Secondary
Education, Beawar, District Beawar.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitender Singh Bhaleria
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
15/10/2024
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by an
order dated 26.09.2024 rendered by this Court in the case of Aka
Ram Banjara (Bhat) Vs. The Board of Revenue & Ors. (S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.19082/2023).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, prays that
the petitioner may be permitted to file a detailed representation
before the competent authorities for redressal of his grievances.
[2024:RJ-JD:41965] (2 of 2) [CW-16859/2024]
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed
of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation to the
competent authorities of the department and the competent
authorities of the department are directed to decide the same
within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such
representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls within the
purview of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Aka
Ram Banjara (Bhat) (supra); the same shall be decided in terms
of the judgment above.
4. The order has been passed based on the submissions
made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine
the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in
case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the
petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought.
5. Stay application also stands disposed of, accordingly.
(FARJAND ALI),J
Abhishek Kumar S.No.16
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!